BACKGROUND: This article presents the results and observed effects of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) external quality assurance scheme in breast histopathology. AIMS/ METHODS: The major objectives were to monitor and improve the consistency of diagnoses made by pathologists and the quality of prognostic information in pathology reports. The scheme is based on a twice yearly circulation of 12 cases to over 600 registered participants. The level of agreement was generally measured using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Four main situations were encountered with respect to diagnostic consistency, namely: (1) where consistency is naturally very high-this included diagnosing in situ and invasive carcinomas (and certain distinctive subtypes) and uncomplicated benign lesions; (2) where the level of consistency was low but could be improved by making guidelines more detailed and explicit-this included histological grading; (3) where consistency could be improved but only by changing the system of classification-this included classification of ductal carcinoma in situ; and (4) where no improvement in consistency could be achieved-this included diagnosing atypical hyperplasia and reporting vascular invasion. Size measurements were more consistent for invasive than in situ carcinomas. Even in cases where there is a high level of agreement on tumour size, a few widely outlying measurements were encountered, for which no explanation is readily forthcoming. CONCLUSIONS: These results broadly confirm the robustness of the systems of breast disease diagnosis and classification adopted by the NHSBSP, and also identify areas where improvement or new approaches are required.
BACKGROUND: This article presents the results and observed effects of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) external quality assurance scheme in breast histopathology. AIMS/ METHODS: The major objectives were to monitor and improve the consistency of diagnoses made by pathologists and the quality of prognostic information in pathology reports. The scheme is based on a twice yearly circulation of 12 cases to over 600 registered participants. The level of agreement was generally measured using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Four main situations were encountered with respect to diagnostic consistency, namely: (1) where consistency is naturally very high-this included diagnosing in situ and invasive carcinomas (and certain distinctive subtypes) and uncomplicated benign lesions; (2) where the level of consistency was low but could be improved by making guidelines more detailed and explicit-this included histological grading; (3) where consistency could be improved but only by changing the system of classification-this included classification of ductal carcinoma in situ; and (4) where no improvement in consistency could be achieved-this included diagnosing atypical hyperplasia and reporting vascular invasion. Size measurements were more consistent for invasive than in situ carcinomas. Even in cases where there is a high level of agreement on tumour size, a few widely outlying measurements were encountered, for which no explanation is readily forthcoming. CONCLUSIONS: These results broadly confirm the robustness of the systems of breast disease diagnosis and classification adopted by the NHSBSP, and also identify areas where improvement or new approaches are required.
Authors: C W Elston; J P Sloane; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Boecker; G Bussolati; D Coleman; C E Connolly; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; V Eusebi; D Faverly; R Holland; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C de Miguel; S Mossi; C Munt; J L Peterse; F Rank; A Reiner; M Sylvan; C A Wells; B Zafrani Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S J Schnitt; J L Connolly; F A Tavassoli; R E Fechner; R L Kempson; R Gelman; D L Page Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: J P Sloane; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Boecker; G Bussolati; D Coleman; C E Connolly; V Eusebi; C De Miguel; P Dervan; R Drijkoningen; C W Elston; D Faverly; A Gad; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C Munt; J L Peterse; F Rank; M Sylvan; V Tsakraklides; B Zafrani Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Monica Morrow; Eric A Strom; Lawrence W Bassett; D David Dershaw; Barbara Fowble; Armando Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Frances O'Malley; Stuart J Schnitt; S Eva Singletary; David P Winchester Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: G Cserni; C A Wells; H Kaya; P Regitnig; A Sapino; G Floris; T Decker; M P Foschini; P J van Diest; D Grabau; A Reiner; J DeGaetano; E Chmielik; A Cordoba; X Andreu; V Zolota; E Charafe-Jauffret; A Ryska; Z Varga; N Weingertner; J P Bellocq; I Liepniece-Karele; G Callagy; J Kulka; H Bürger; P Figueiredo; J Wesseling; I Amendoeira; D Faverly; C M Quinn; S Bianchi Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: D M Parham; D Coleman; S Kodikara; S Moss; I O Ellis; S Al-Sam; N Anderson; L Bobrow; I Buley; C E Connolly; N S Dallimore; S Hales; A Hanby; S Humphreys; F Knox; J Lowe; J Macartney; R Nash; J Patnick; S E Pinder; C M Quinn; A J Robertson; J Shrimankar; R A Walker; C Wells; R Winder; N Patel Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: J H J M van Krieken; A Jung; T Kirchner; F Carneiro; R Seruca; F T Bosman; P Quirke; J F Fléjou; T Plato Hansen; G de Hertogh; P Jares; C Langner; G Hoefler; M Ligtenberg; D Tiniakos; S Tejpar; G Bevilacqua; A Ensari Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Elsebeth Lynge; Antonio Ponti; Ted James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Alfonso Frigerio; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Mireille Broeders; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; Maria Ederra; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Mariano Tomatis; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen Taplin Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 9.162