AIMS: To assess the effect on abstinence rates of pairing up smokers attending a general practice smokers, clinic to provide mutual support between clinic sessions. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing a "buddy" condition with a "solo condition" in which smokers received the e same treatment but were not paired up. SETTING:A general practice smokers' clinic in London. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seventy-two smokers recruited by mailshot. INTERVENTION. Smokers attended a nurse-led smokers clinic 1 week prior to their quit date, on the quite date, 1 week later and 3 weeks after that. Smokers in the buddy condition were paired with another smoker trying to give up at the same time to provide mutual support between clinic sessions. MEASUREMENT: The main outcome measure was the percentage of smokers still abstinent from cigarettes at end of treatment (weeks from quite date), verified by expired air carbon monoxide concentration. FINDINGS: The percentage of smokers still abstinent at the end of treatment was significantly higher in the buddy condition than the solo condition (27% vs. 12%). CONCLUSIONS: A buddy system can provide an effective element of a smoking cessation intervention at minimal cost. Further research is needed to establish the long-term efficacy of this approach and examine the effectiveness of incorporating social support into other types of smoking cessation programmes.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess the effect on abstinence rates of pairing up smokers attending a general practice smokers, clinic to provide mutual support between clinic sessions. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing a "buddy" condition with a "solo condition" in which smokers received the e same treatment but were not paired up. SETTING: A general practice smokers' clinic in London. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seventy-two smokers recruited by mailshot. INTERVENTION. Smokers attended a nurse-led smokers clinic 1 week prior to their quit date, on the quite date, 1 week later and 3 weeks after that. Smokers in the buddy condition were paired with another smoker trying to give up at the same time to provide mutual support between clinic sessions. MEASUREMENT: The main outcome measure was the percentage of smokers still abstinent from cigarettes at end of treatment (weeks from quite date), verified by expired air carbon monoxide concentration. FINDINGS: The percentage of smokers still abstinent at the end of treatment was significantly higher in the buddy condition than the solo condition (27% vs. 12%). CONCLUSIONS: A buddy system can provide an effective element of a smoking cessation intervention at minimal cost. Further research is needed to establish the long-term efficacy of this approach and examine the effectiveness of incorporating social support into other types of smoking cessation programmes.
Authors: Paul Aveyard; Karen Brown; Cas Saunders; Avril Alexander; Elaine Johnstone; Marcus R Munafò; Mike Murphy Journal: Thorax Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Rajani S Sadasivam; Sarah L Cutrona; Tana M Luger; Erik Volz; Rebecca Kinney; Sowmya R Rao; Jeroan J Allison; Thomas K Houston Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 4.244