Rajani S Sadasivam1, Sarah L Cutrona2,3, Tana M Luger1,4, Erik Volz5, Rebecca Kinney1, Sowmya R Rao6, Jeroan J Allison1, Thomas K Houston1,4. 1. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. 3. Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, MA. 4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA. 5. Imperial College London, London, UK. 6. Department of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although technology-assisted tobacco interventions (TATIs) are effective, they are underused due to recruitment challenges. We tested whether we could successfully recruit smokers to a TATI using peer marketing through a social network (Facebook). METHODS: We recruited smokers on Facebook using online advertisements. These recruited smokers (seeds) and subsequent waves of smokers (peer recruits) were provided the Share2Quit peer recruitment Facebook app and other tools. Smokers were incentivized for up to seven successful peer recruitments and had 30 days to recruit from date of registration. Successful peer recruitment was defined as a peer recruited smoker completing the registration on the TATI following a referral. Our primary questions were (1) whether smokers would recruit other smokers and (2) whether peer recruitment would extend the reach of the intervention to harder-to-reach groups, including those not ready to quit and minority smokers. RESULTS: Overall, 759 smokers were recruited (seeds: 190; peer recruits: 569). Fifteen percent (n = 117) of smokers successfully recruited their peers (seeds: 24.7%; peer recruits: 7.7%) leading to four recruitment waves. Compared to seeds, peer recruits were less likely to be ready to quit (peer recruits 74.2% vs. seeds 95.1%), more likely to be male (67.1% vs. 32.9%), and more likely to be African American (23.8% vs. 10.8%) (p < .01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Peer marketing quadrupled our engaged smokers and enriched the sample with not-ready-to-quit and African American smokers. Peer recruitment is promising, and our study uncovered several important challenges for future research. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the successful recruitment of smokers to a TATI using a Facebook-based peer marketing strategy. Smokers on Facebook were willing and able to recruit other smokers to a TATI, yielding a large and diverse population of smokers.
INTRODUCTION: Although technology-assisted tobacco interventions (TATIs) are effective, they are underused due to recruitment challenges. We tested whether we could successfully recruit smokers to a TATI using peer marketing through a social network (Facebook). METHODS: We recruited smokers on Facebook using online advertisements. These recruited smokers (seeds) and subsequent waves of smokers (peer recruits) were provided the Share2Quit peer recruitment Facebook app and other tools. Smokers were incentivized for up to seven successful peer recruitments and had 30 days to recruit from date of registration. Successful peer recruitment was defined as a peer recruited smoker completing the registration on the TATI following a referral. Our primary questions were (1) whether smokers would recruit other smokers and (2) whether peer recruitment would extend the reach of the intervention to harder-to-reach groups, including those not ready to quit and minority smokers. RESULTS: Overall, 759 smokers were recruited (seeds: 190; peer recruits: 569). Fifteen percent (n = 117) of smokers successfully recruited their peers (seeds: 24.7%; peer recruits: 7.7%) leading to four recruitment waves. Compared to seeds, peer recruits were less likely to be ready to quit (peer recruits 74.2% vs. seeds 95.1%), more likely to be male (67.1% vs. 32.9%), and more likely to be African American (23.8% vs. 10.8%) (p < .01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Peer marketing quadrupled our engaged smokers and enriched the sample with not-ready-to-quit and African American smokers. Peer recruitment is promising, and our study uncovered several important challenges for future research. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the successful recruitment of smokers to a TATI using a Facebook-based peer marketing strategy. Smokers on Facebook were willing and able to recruit other smokers to a TATI, yielding a large and diverse population of smokers.
Authors: Rajani S Sadasivam; Timothy P Hogan; Julie E Volkman; Bridget M Smith; Heather L Coley; Jessica H Williams; Kathryn Delaughter; Midge N Ray; Gregg H Gilbert; Daniel E Ford; Jeroan J Allison; Thomas K Houston Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: José A Bauermeister; Marc A Zimmerman; Michelle M Johns; Pietreck Glowacki; Sarah Stoddard; Erik Volz Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Karla D Wagner; Matthew J Moynihan; Steffanie A Strathdee; Jazmine Cuevas-Mota; Maureen Clark; María Luisa Zúñiga; Tyson A Volkmann; Eyasu Teshale; Richard S Garfein Journal: J Ethn Subst Abuse Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.507
Authors: Nathan K Cobb; Amanda L Graham; M Justin Byron; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: John A Naslund; Sunny Jung Kim; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Laura J McCulloch; Mary F Brunette; Jesse Dallery; Stephen J Bartels; Lisa A Marsch Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jamie M Faro; Catherine S Nagawa; Elizabeth A Orvek; Bridget M Smith; Amanda C Blok; Thomas K Houston; Ariana Kamberi; Jeroan J Allison; Sharina D Person; Rajani S Sadasivam Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Luella Fu; Megan A Jacobs; Jody Brookover; Thomas W Valente; Nathan K Cobb; Amanda L Graham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eduardo L Bunge; Lesley A Taylor; Melissa Bond; Taylor N Stephens; Kara Nishimuta; Alinne Z Barrera; Robert Wickham; Ricardo F Muñoz Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2019-02-26
Authors: Yannick B Helms; Nora Hamdiui; Mirjam E E Kretzschmar; Luis E C Rocha; Jim E van Steenbergen; Linus Bengtsson; Anna Thorson; Aura Timen; Mart L Stein Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Catherine Sanchez; Adrienne Grzenda; Andrea Varias; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter; William M McDonald; Charles B Nemeroff; Ned H Kalin; Glenn Martin; Mauricio Tohen; Maria Filippou-Frye; Drew Ramsey; Eleni Linos; Christina Mangurian; Carolyn I Rodriguez Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.735