Literature DB >> 9741796

Magnetic stimulation mapping of motor cortex: factors contributing to map area.

G W Thickbroom1, R Sammut, F L Mastaglia.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can evoke an electromyographic response in muscles of the hand with stimulation at a large number of scalp sites widely spaced over the contralateral primary motor area of the brain. To determine the extent to which this is due to current spread from the stimulating coil to a smaller region of excited cortex, excitability curves of motor evoked potential amplitude vs. stimulus intensity were measured at multiple scalp sites. It was found that these curves were of very similar shape, but with different offsets along the stimulus intensity axis. This could be explained on the basis of current flow to a small excitable region of cortex located at some depth in the brain. It is concluded that the surface area of TMS maps is primarily determined by current spread and by the relationship between the position of the coil on the scalp and the depth of the motor output region in the cortex, and does not necessarily provide a true indication of the spatial extent of the motor output region projecting to the target muscle.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9741796     DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(98)00006-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  21 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The motor cortical representation of a muscle is not homogeneous in brain connectivity.

Authors:  Jo Armour Smith; Alaa Albishi; Sarine Babikian; Skulpan Asavasopon; Beth E Fisher; Jason J Kutch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler; Jay L Alberts; Min Wook Kim
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Intra- and intersubject reliability of abductor pollicis brevis muscle motor map characteristics with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Scott F Corneal; Andrew J Butler; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Motor cortex representation of deep and superficial neck flexor muscles in individuals with and without neck pain.

Authors:  Edith Elgueta-Cancino; Welber Marinovic; Gwendolen Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Associative plasticity in the human motor cortex is enhanced by concurrently targeting separate muscle representations with excitatory and inhibitory protocols.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Abbey S Nydam; Martin V Sale; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Using paired pulse TMS to facilitate contralateral and ipsilateral MEPs in upper extremity muscles of chronic hemiparetic stroke patients.

Authors:  Susan C Schwerin; Jun Yao; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Corticomotor organisation and motor function in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Michelle L Byrnes; Sarah A Archer; Allan G Kermode; Frank L Mastaglia
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.