Literature DB >> 9741752

Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG.

S P van den Broek1, F Reinders, M Donderwinkel, M J Peters.   

Abstract

Volume conductor models that are commonly used to describe the EEG and MEG neglect holes in the skull, lesions, the ventricles, and anisotropic conductivity of the skull. To determine the influence of these features, simulations were carried out using the finite element method. The simulations showed that a hole in the skull will have a large effect on the EEG, and as one of the consequences localisation errors up to 15 mm may occur. The effect on the MEG is negligible. The presence of a lesion may cause the shape and magnitude of the EEG and MEG to change. Hence, a lesion has to be taken into account, if the active neurones are close to it. Moreover, a localisation procedure may fail if the lesion is not included in the volume conductor model. Inclusion of the ventricles in the volume conductor model is necessary only if sources are in their vicinity or if their sizes are unusually large. Anisotropic conductivity of the skull has a smearing effect on the EEG but does not influence the MEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9741752     DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  62 in total

1.  Generation of scalp discharges in temporal lobe epilepsy as suggested by intraoperative electrocorticographic recordings.

Authors:  J L Fernández Torre; G Alarcón; C D Binnie; J J Seoane; J Juler; C N Guy; C E Polkey
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Electroencephalographic imaging of higher brain function.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith; L K McEvoy; H Leong; J Le
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.

Authors:  B Vanrumste; G Van Hoey; R Van de Walle; M D'Havé; I Lemahieu; P Boon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Dannhauer; Benjamin Lanfer; Carsten H Wolters; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.

Authors:  Olaf Steinsträter; Stephanie Sillekens; Markus Junghoefer; Martin Burger; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The generation of tetrahedral mesh models for neuroanatomical MRI.

Authors:  Carl Lederman; Anand Joshi; Ivo Dinov; Luminita Vese; Arthur Toga; John Darrell Van Horn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Lasting modulation effects of rTMS on neural activity and connectivity as revealed by resting-state EEG.

Authors:  Lei Ding; Guofa Shou; Han Yuan; Diamond Urbano; Yoon-Hee Cha
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Modeling skull electrical properties.

Authors:  R J Sadleir; A Argibay
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Language Neuroplasticity in Brain Tumor Patients Revealed by Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Elke De Witte; Joanna Sierpowska; Xiaochen Zheng; Leighton B Hinkley; Danielle Mizuiri; Robert T Knight; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.

Authors:  Seok Lew; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-sun Choe; P Ellen Grant; Yoshio Okada; Carsten H Wolters; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.