Literature DB >> 9740424

Effects of profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation on follicular activity, oocyte and embryo function in cycles stimulated with purified follicle stimulating hormone.

R Fleming1, F Lloyd, M Herbert, J Fenwick, T Griffiths, A Murdoch.   

Abstract

The effects of profound suppression of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during the follicular phase of in-vitro fertilization cycles were explored in normal women during treatment with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue and exogenous purified follicle stimulating hormone. Ovarian responses to treatment and the capacity of supernumerary embryos to undergo blastocyst formation were examined in groups of patients defined by the concentration of plasma LH in the mid-follicular phase. Concentrations < or = 0.5 IU/I diagnosed the group with profoundly suppressed LH (<LH, n = 20), which was compared with the remaining patients (nLH, n = 41). The <LH group showed lower oestradiol concentrations at human chorionic gonadotrophin administration, while the total follicular development estimated by the total follicular diameters was similar in both groups. The oestradiol secreted per follicle, estimated by the circulating concentration per mm total follicular diameter, was significantly lower in the <LH group. The combined effects of a trend to lower yield of oocytes (not significant) and a lower fertilization rate (not significant) resulted in a significantly reduced quantity of embryos available for cryopreservation after the fresh transfer. Supernumerary embryos were cultured for 7 days to determine blastocyst development rates, and the degree of LH suppression made no difference to embryo developmental competence (nLH, 23%; <LH, 27%), or the rates of blastocyst formation. The group of patients with profoundly suppressed mid-follicular phase LH showed a reduced yield of oocytes and embryos which resulted in significantly fewer embryos available for cryopreservation. However, the developmental potential of those embryos, represented by the ability to form blastocysts in vitro, was unaffected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9740424     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  24 in total

1.  The Ideal Stimulation Protocol: Is There One?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-01

2.  Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-agonist protocol: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Batista A Oliveira; Ana Lucia Mauri; Claudia G Petersen; Anice M C Martins; João Cornicelli; Mario Cavanha; Anagloria Pontes; Ricardo L R Baruffi; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Efficacy of a combined protocol of urinary and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone used for ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing ICSI cycle.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Cesare Aragona; Renzo Gaglione; Helmy Selman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  The role of luteinizing hormone activity in controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  N Angelopoulos; A Goula; G Tolis
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  [Effects of luteinizing hormone supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients undergoing GnRH-agonist long protocol].

Authors:  Yu Deng; Min-Na Yin; Pei-Ling Liang; Zhi-Heng Chen; Ling Sun
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Does lower dose of long-acting triptorelin maintain pituitary suppression and produce good live birth rate in long down-regulation protocol for in-vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Xin Chen; Shu-Xian Feng; Ping-Ping Guo; Yu-Xia He; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-13

8.  The effect of rLH supplementation to the GnRH-antagonist protocol on endocrine dynamics in the advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  J S Younis; I Izhaki; M Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Mild/minimal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation of patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  L Rinaldi; F Lisi; H Selman
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  "hCG priming" effect in controlled ovarian stimulation through a long protocol.

Authors:  Panagiotis Beretsos; George A Partsinevelos; Eleni Arabatzi; Peter Drakakis; Depy Mavrogianni; Elli Anagnostou; Kostas Stefanidis; Aris Antsaklis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.