Literature DB >> 9737634

Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited.

J R Smith1, M L Friedell, M L Cheatham, S P Martin, M J Cohen, J D Horowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compares central venous catheters (CVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) for indications for insertion, complications, and economic impact.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 838 (283 CVC, 555 PICC) consecutively placed venous catheters reflected 49,365 CVC and 11,814 PICC days.
RESULTS: There were 57 (20%) complications in the CVC group, 197 (35%) complications in the PICC group. PICC were associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of catheter malfunction (P = 0.0005), arm vein phlebitis (P = 0.0004), and overall complications (P = 0.00001). A higher complication rate was noted in PICC inserted for chemotherapy (P = 0.00001) and parenteral hyperalimentation administration (P = 0.04). Charges for inpatient insertion of PICC and CVC were $500 and $2,500, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PICC have a significantly higher complication rate than CVC. PICC provide cost-effective central access of 2 to 3 weeks' duration, reserving operatively placed CVC for longer access requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9737634     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00121-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  Long-term use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for cancer chemotherapy in children.

Authors:  Akinobu Matsuzaki; Aiko Suminoe; Yuhki Koga; Miho Hatano; Sagano Hattori; Toshiro Hara
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Impact of postplacement adjustment of peripherally inserted central catheters on the risk of bloodstream infection and venous thrombus formation.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Baxi; Emily K Shuman; Christy A Scipione; Benrong Chen; Aditi Sharma; Jennifer J K Rasanathan; Carol E Chenoweth
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are not superior to central venous catheters in the acute care of surgical patients on the ward.

Authors:  Simon Turcotte; Serge Dubé; Gilles Beauchamp
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Efficacy of multifaceted interventions in reducing complications of peripherally inserted central catheter in adult oncology patients.

Authors:  Geng Tian; Yan Zhu; Li Qi; Fengqin Guo; Haidan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  How is that? Knotting of a peripherally inserted central venous catheter.

Authors:  Gnanamuthu Birla Roy; Ajit A Cheriyan; Manbha L Rymbai
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-05

6.  Safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction of peripherally inserted central catheters in terminally ill cancer patients: a prospective multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Kwonoh Park; Hyun Jung Jun; So Yeon Oh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies.

Authors:  C Harter; T Ostendorf; A Bach; G Egerer; H Goldschmidt; A D Ho
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Incidence of deep vein thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Josée Dubois; Françoise Rypens; Laurent Garel; Michèle David; Jacques Lacroix; France Gauvin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Access technique and its problems in parenteral nutrition - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 9.

Authors:  K W Jauch; W Schregel; Z Stanga; S C Bischoff; P Brass; W Hartl; S Muehlebach; E Pscheidl; P Thul; O Volk
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.