Literature DB >> 9734496

A randomized active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients. Mycophenolate Mofetil Investigators.

J Kobashigawa1, L Miller, D Renlund, R Mentzer, E Alderman, R Bourge, M Costanzo, H Eisen, G Dureau, R Ratkovec, M Hummel, D Ipe, J Johnson, A Keogh, R Mamelok, D Mancini, F Smart, H Valantine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After heart transplantation, 1-year and 5-year survival rates are 79% and 63%, respectively, with rejection, infection, and allograft coronary artery disease accounting for the majority of deaths. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an inhibitor of the de novo pathway for purine biosynthesis, decreases rejection in animals and in human renal transplantation.
METHODS: In a double-blind, active-controlled trial, 28 centers randomized 650 patients undergoing their first heart transplant to receive MMF (3000 mg/day) or azathioprine (1.5-3 mg/kg/day), in addition to cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Rejection and survival data were obtained for 6 and 12 months, respectively. Because 11% of the patients withdrew before receiving study drug, data were analyzed on all randomized patients (enrolled patients) and on patients who received study medications (treated patients).
RESULTS: Survival and rejection were similar in enrolled patients (MMF, n=327; azathioprine, n=323). In treated patients (MMF, n=289; azathioprine, n=289), the MMF group compared with the azathioprine group was associated with significant reduction in mortality at 1 year (18 [6.2%] versus 33 deaths [11.4%]; P=0.031) and a significant reduction in the requirement for rejection treatment (65.7% versus 73.7%; P=0.026). There was a trend for fewer MMF patients to have > or = grade 3A rejection (45.0% versus 52.9%; P=0.055) or require the murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody or antithymocyte globulin (15.2% versus 21.1%; P=0.061). Opportunistic infections, mostly herpes simplex, were more common in the MMF group (53.3% versus 43.6%; P=0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of MMF for azathioprine may reduce mortality and rejection in the first year after cardiac transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9734496     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199808270-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  60 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Mario C Deng
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The long-term outcome of treated sensitized patients who undergo heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jon A Kobashigawa; Jignesh K Patel; Michelle M Kittleson; Matt A Kawano; Krista K Kiyosaki; Stephanie N Davis; Jaime D Moriguchi; Elaine F Reed; Abbas A Ardehali
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference update on cardiac transplantation 2008: Executive Summary.

Authors:  H Haddad; D Isaac; J F Legare; P Pflugfelder; P Hendry; M Chan; B Cantin; N Giannetti; S Zieroth; M White; W Warnica; K Doucette; V Rao; A Dipchand; M Cantarovich; W Kostuk; R Cecere; E Charbonneau; H Ross; N Poirier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date.

Authors:  Gregory I Snell; Glen P Westall; Miranda A Paraskeva
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Hepatitis: new hope for difficult cases of autoimmune hepatitis.

Authors:  Ugur Halac; Fernando Alvarez
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 8.  New frontiers in immunosuppression.

Authors:  Luke J Benvenuto; Michaela R Anderson; Selim M Arcasoy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Mycophenolate mofetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Young; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Immunosuppressive therapy in older cardiac transplant patients.

Authors:  Arezu Zejnab Aliabadi; Andreas Oliver Zuckermann; Michael Grimm
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.