Literature DB >> 9733621

Osteogenic potential of cultured periosteal cells in a distracted bone gap in rabbits.

A Takushima1, Y Kitano, K Harii.   

Abstract

Osteogenesis of cultured periosteal cells was investigated in a bone-defective gap that was created artificially by distraction in the tibia of 12-week-old rabbits. A 10-mm circumferential length of periosteum was stripped from each stump of the osteotomized tibia, and the tibia was distracted rapidly (2 mm/day), resulting in disturbance of callus formation. Periosteal-derived cells, which were isolated from the contralateral tibia, were introduced into cell culture, subcultured twice to a population of 5 x 10(7) cells, and then injected into the defective bone gap when distraction was complete. Following inoculation of the cultured cells, significant new bone formation in the bone gap was observed. The control group which did not undergo cell transplantation showed only slight new callus formation which is supposed to be formed by osteogenic cells from the bone marrow. The bone mineral content of newly formed bone between the distracted tibia was analyzed quantitatively on radiographs. Histologically, the transplanted cells initially formed a mass at the injected site and then gradually differentiated into bone tissue from the peripheral region. Bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemical stain was utilized to investigate the localization of the transplanted cells. The present study confirms that the orthotopically implanted periosteum-derived cells facilitate osteogenesis in a bone defect created using distraction in rabbits. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9733621     DOI: 10.1006/jsre.1998.5378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  7 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale mechanobiology of de novo bone generation, remodeling and adaptation of autograft in a common ovine femur model.

Authors:  Melissa L Knothe Tate; Scott Dolejs; Sarah H McBride; R Matthew Miller; Ulf R Knothe
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-03-16

2.  Osteogenic Potential of Mouse Periosteum-Derived Cells Sorted for CD90 In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  You-Kyoung Kim; Hidemi Nakata; Maiko Yamamoto; Munemitsu Miyasaka; Shohei Kasugai; Shinji Kuroda
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Angle stable nails provide improved healing for a complex fracture model in the femur.

Authors:  Meghan R Kubacki; Christopher A Verioti; Savan D Patel; Adam N Garlock; David Fernandez; Patrick J Atkinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone engineering on the basis of periosteal cells cultured in polymer fleeces.

Authors:  A Redlich; C Perka; O Schultz; R Spitzer; T Häupl; G R Burmester; M Sittinger
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Mechanical force-induced midpalatal suture remodeling in mice.

Authors:  Bo Hou; Naomi Fukai; Bjorn R Olsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Is there an optimal initial amount of activation for midpalatal suture expansion? : A histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Akram S Alyessary; Adrian U Yap; Siti A Othman; Mohammad T Rahman; N M Al-Namnam; Zamri Radzi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  The Molecular and Cellular Events That Take Place during Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Yoav Leiser
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-02-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.