Literature DB >> 15347948

Bone engineering on the basis of periosteal cells cultured in polymer fleeces.

A Redlich1, C Perka, O Schultz, R Spitzer, T Häupl, G R Burmester, M Sittinger.   

Abstract

Large bone defects caused by severe trauma, infection or tumor resection are still a major challenge for orthopaedic surgery. The key concept for successful bone regeneration consists of combining the osteoinductive effect of osteogenic cells with a suitable carrier structure to promote osteoblastic differentiation and optimal matrix production. Therefore, periosteal cells cultured in polyglycolic-polylactid acid (PGLA) fleeces were investigated for their osteogenic differentiation and used to repair critical size bone defects in a rabbit model. Periosteal cells were isolated from New Zealand White rabbits and expanded in vitro. Osteogenic differentiation was investigated by analysis of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin production in vitro depending on culture conditions and passage number. Cells were seeded into PGLA fleeces. After further cultivation, tissue constructs were examined histologically and by immunohistochemistry for cell distribution and osteogenic differentiation. These constructs of defined size were used to repair critical size calvarial defects (group I) in rabbits compared to a defect repair with polymers only (group II) or to untreated defects (group III). Bone healing was evaluated after 4 weeks by radiodensitometry and a special histological scoring system. For early evaluation, radiodensitometry was not sensitive enough to detect differences in calcification. However, on histologic examination the group with cell/fleece constructs revealed intense formation of uncalcified bone. The mean defect closure of the experimental group I was 65%, compared to control groups II and III with 31% and 22%, respectively. The established methods of 3-D-cell culture and ex-vivo transplant assessment proved to be a valuable tool for quality assurance. The results demonstrate that the combination of periosteal cells and polymer fleeces is a tissue engineering approach, which may have clinical applications in various fields of reconstructive surgery. Copyright 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 15347948     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008994715605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  19 in total

1.  Osteogenic potential of cultured periosteal cells in a distracted bone gap in rabbits.

Authors:  A Takushima; Y Kitano; K Harii
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Femoral shaft reconstruction using tissue-engineered growth of bone.

Authors:  W C Puelacher; J P Vacanti; N F Ferraro; B Schloo; C A Vacanti
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 3.  Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain.

Authors:  R L Duncan; C H Turner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Differentiative ability of the tibial periosteum for the embryonic chick.

Authors:  P Scott-Savage; B K Hall
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1980

5.  Activation of the resting periosteum.

Authors:  D N Tornberg; C A Bassett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Tissue engineering of human cartilage tissue for reconstructive surgery using biocompatible resorbable fibrin gel and polymer carriers].

Authors:  A Haisch; O Schultz; C Perka; V Jahnke; G R Burmester; M Sittinger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Transplantation of in vitro cultured cartilage materials: characterization of matrix synthesis].

Authors:  N Rotter; M Sittinger; C Hammer; J Bujía; E Kastenbauer
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.057

8.  Tissue engineered bone-regeneration using degradable polymers: the formation of mineralized matrices.

Authors:  C T Laurencin; M A Attawia; H E Elgendy; K M Herbert
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The cartilaginous fracture callus in rats.

Authors:  A Henricson; A Hulth; O Johnell
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-06

10.  Resorbable polyesters in cartilage engineering: affinity and biocompatibility of polymer fiber structures to chondrocytes.

Authors:  M Sittinger; D Reitzel; M Dauner; H Hierlemann; C Hammer; E Kastenbauer; H Planck; G R Burmester; J Bujia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996
View more
  6 in total

1.  Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells in computer designed fibrin-polymer-ceramic scaffolds manufactured by fused deposition modeling.

Authors:  Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Arthur Brandwood; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher; Hwei Ling Khor; Katharina Bittner
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Osteogenic potential of human periosteum-derived progenitor cells in PLGA scaffold using allogeneic serum.

Authors:  Yi-xiong Zheng; Jochen Ringe; Zhong Liang; Alexander Loch; Li Chen; Michael Sittinger
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hana Chang; Melissa L Knothe Tate
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  A sulfated nanofibrous mesh supporting the osteogenic differentiation of periosteum-derived cells.

Authors:  Tera M Filion; Jie Song
Journal:  J Biomater Tissue Eng       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 5.  Emerging strategies of bone and joint repair.

Authors:  O Schultz; M Sittinger; T Haeupl; G R Burmester
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2000-08-10

Review 6.  The periosteum: a simple tissue with many faces, with special reference to the antler-lineage periostea.

Authors:  Chunyi Li; Peter Fennessy
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.540

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.