Literature DB >> 8968014

Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group.

J D Curb1, S L Pressel, J A Cutler, P J Savage, W B Applegate, H Black, G Camel, B R Davis, P H Frost, N Gonzalez, G Guthrie, A Oberman, G H Rutan, J Stamler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of low-dose, diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on major cardiovascular disease (CVD) event rates in older, non-insulin-treated diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), compared with nondiabetic patients.
DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP).
SETTING: Multiple clinical and support centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4736 men and women aged 60 years and older at baseline with ISH (systolic blood pressure [BP], > or = 160 mm Hg; diastolic BP, <90 mm Hg) at baseline, 583 non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients and 4149 nondiabetic patients (4 additional patients not so classifiable were randomized but not included in these analyses). Diabetes mellitus defined as physician diagnosis, taking oral hypoglycemic drugs, fasting glucose level of 7.8 mmol/L or more (> or = 140 mg/dL), or any combination of these characteristics. INTERVENTION: The active treatment group received a low dose of chlorthalidone (12.5-25.0 mg/d) with a step-up to atenolol (25.0-50.0 mg/d) or reserpine (0.05-0.10 mg/d) if needed. The placebo group received placebo and any active antihypertensive drugs prescribed by patient's private physician for persistently high BP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 5-year rates of major CVD events, nonfatal plus fatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD), major CHD events, and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: The SHEP antihypertensive drug regimen lowered BP of both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, with few adverse effects. For both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, all outcome rates were lower for participants randomized to the active treatment group than for those randomized to the placebo group. Thus, 5-year major CVD rate was lower by 34% for active treatment compared with placebo, both for diabetic patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-54%) and nondiabetic patients (95% CI, 21%-45%). Absolute risk reduction with active treatment compared with placebo was twice as great for diabetic vs nondiabetic patients (101/1000 vs 51/1000 randomized participants at the 5-year follow-up), reflecting the higher risk of diabetic patients.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose diuretic-based (chlorthalidone) treatment is effective in preventing major CVD events, cerebral and cardiac, in both non-insulin-treated diabetic and nondiabetic older patients with ISH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8968014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  174 in total

Review 1.  The UK prospective diabetes study (UKPDS): clinical and therapeutic implications for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P King; I Peacock; R Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Inferiority of calcium channel blockers to cheaper drugs. News item was inaccurate on at least two counts.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

3.  Preventive medicine in people at high risk for chronic disease: the value of identifying and treating diabetes.

Authors:  H C Gerstein; S Meltzer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Diuretics as a basis of antihypertensive therapy. An overview.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Treatment of coexisting diabetes and hypertension.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  The need to lower systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  S Shrivastava; M S Kochar
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Old antihypertensive agents-diuretics and beta-blockers: do we know how and in whom they lower blood pressure?

Authors:  D A Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Managing cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  L Rydén
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: an update.

Authors:  Guido Lastra; Sofia Syed; L Romayne Kurukulasuriya; Camila Manrique; James R Sowers
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.