Literature DB >> 9730450

Sensitivity and specificity of NMP-22, telomerase, and BTA in the detection of human bladder cancer.

J Landman1, Y Chang, E Kavaler, M J Droller, B C Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The recent introduction of novel molecular markers into clinical urology has created a need to evaluate the efficacy and utility of these potential markers. The ideal assay for bladder cancer should be noninvasive, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective. We compared the Matritech nuclear maxtrix protein (NMP)-22 assay, telomerase activity, and the Bard bladder tumor antigen (BTA) assay for the detection of human bladder cancer.
METHODS: A single voided urine sample was obtained from patients with hematuria without bladder cancer and from patients with known bladder cancer before any treatment. Approximately 50 to 100 mL of voided urine sample was collected and aliquotted for the various assays. The results were compared to single cytologic results and ultimately to pathologic findings.
RESULTS: In 47 patients with bladder cancer, the overall sensitivity was 81% for NMP-22, 80% for telomerase, 40% for BTA, and 40% for cytology. For Ta tumors (n = 31), sensitivity was 81% for NMP-22, 70% for telomerase, 32% for BTA, and 26% for cytology. For T1 or higher stage tumors (n = 13), sensitivity was 82% for NMP-22, 91% for telomerase, 64% for BTA, and 64% for cytology. The remaining 3 patients had carcinoma in situ (CIS). When tumors were stratified by tumor grade, grade I tumors (n = 16) were detected at 69% with NMP-22, 65% with telomerase, 13% with BTA, and 6% with cytology. Grade II tumors (n = 14) were detected at 86% with NMP-22, 72% with telomerase, 36% with BTA, and 36% with cytology. Grade III tumors (n = 14) were detected at 93% with NMP-22, 93% with telomerase, 79% with BTA, and 79% with cytology. Patients with CIS (n = 3) were detected at 67% with NMP-22, 100% with telomerase, 33% with BTA, and 67% with cytology. In 30 patients with hematuria but without bladder cancer, the overall specificity of the assays was 77% for NMP-22, 80% for telomerase, 73% for BTA, and 94% for cytology.
CONCLUSIONS: In the population tested, NMP-22 and the telomerase assays gave similar sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bladder cancer, and appear to offer a greater sensitivity than the BTA assay and/or conventional cytology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730450     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00219-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  36 in total

1.  Nephrology: 2. Evaluation of asymptomatic hematuria and proteinuria in adult primary care.

Authors:  Andrew A House; Daniel C Cattran
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Identification of novel gene targets and putative regulators of arsenic-associated DNA methylation in human urothelial cells and bladder cancer.

Authors:  Julia E Rager; Sloane K Tilley; Samantha E Tulenko; Lisa Smeester; Paul D Ray; Andrew Yosim; Jenna M Currier; María C Ishida; Maria Del Carmen González-Horta; Blanca Sánchez-Ramírez; Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias; Daniela S Gutiérrez-Torres; Zuzana Drobná; Luz M Del Razo; Gonzalo G García-Vargas; William Y Kim; Yi-Hui Zhou; Fred A Wright; Miroslav Stýblo; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Diagnostic Utility of the ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ Test in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten L Greene; Anna Berry; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

5.  Telomerase activity detected by quantitative assay in bladder carcinoma and exfoliated cells in urine.

Authors:  R Fedriga; R Gunelli; O Nanni; F Bacci; D Amadori; D Calistri
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 6.  The emerging role of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for urogenital cancers.

Authors:  Muhammad Nawaz; Giovanni Camussi; Hadi Valadi; Irina Nazarenko; Karin Ekström; Xiaoqin Wang; Simona Principe; Neelam Shah; Naeem M Ashraf; Farah Fatima; Luciano Neder; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Jose A Karam; Yair Lotan; Pierre I Karakiewizc
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

8.  Cystatin B as a tissue and urinary biomarker of bladder cancer recurrence and disease progression.

Authors:  Adam S Feldman; Jacqueline Banyard; Chin-Lee Wu; W Scott McDougal; Bruce R Zetter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Usefulness of the NMP22BladderChek Test for Screening and Follow-up of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Hwa Sub Choi; Sang Ik Lee; Dong Jun Kim; Tae Yoong Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

10.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.