Literature DB >> 9730118

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

L G Lenke1, R R Betz, K H Bridwell, D H Clements, J Harms, T G Lowe, H L Shufflebarger.   

Abstract

The system described by King et al. is the standard method for the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although it is widely used and referenced, its reliability and reproducibility among scoliosis surgeons are unknown. We used a scoliosis case-presentation format to examine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the system of King et al. Eight active, current members of the Scoliosis Research Society reviewed twenty-seven full-length radiographs that had been made before operative correction of the scoliotic deformity. On the basis of these images, which included posteroanterior and lateral radiographs made with the patient standing as well as right and left forced-side-bending radiographs made with the patient supine, the reviewers assigned a type to each curve according to the classification system of King et al. Kappa coefficients were used to test statistical reliability. The mean interobserver reliability of the classification was only 64 per cent (range, 54 to 77 per cent) when the responses of seven of the reviewers were compared with those of one of the originators of the classification. The mean kappa coefficient was 0.49 (range, 0.27 to 0.73), which indicates poor reliability. When each reviewer's responses were compared with those of the other reviewers, the reliability was similarly poor (interobserver reliability, 55 per cent [range, 33 to 81 per cent] and mean kappa coefficient, 0.40 [range, 0.21 to 0.63]). Intraobserver reliability was evaluated in a trial in which five reviewers in a group setting were shown the same radiographs in a different order at two different viewings. Comparison of the results at the two viewings revealed a mean intraobserver reliability of 69 per cent (range, 56 to 85 per cent) and a mean kappa coefficient of 0.62 (range, 0.34 to 0.95), which indicates fair reliability. The current method of classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not appear to have sufficient intraobserver or interobserver reliability among scoliosis surgeons to portray curve types accurately. Thus, it may not help to guide treatment with use of modern spinal fixation methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730118     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  38 in total

Review 1.  Computer algorithms and applications used to assist the evaluation and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of published articles 2000-2009.

Authors:  Philippe Phan; Neila Mezghani; Carl-Éric Aubin; Jacques A de Guise; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A Kohonen neural network description of scoliosis fused regions and their corresponding Lenke classification.

Authors:  N Mezghani; P Phan; A Mitiche; H Labelle; J A de Guise
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Intra and interobserver variability of preoperative planning for surgical instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Robitaille; C E Aubin; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Variability of spinal instrumentation configurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle; Oana C Ciolofan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Computer-generated index for evaluation of idiopathic scoliosis in digital chest images: a comparison with digital measurement.

Authors:  Fuk-hay Tang; Lawrence W C Chan; Hin-pong Lau; Po-yan Tsui; Chi-wa Cheung
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.

Authors:  John R Dimar; Leah Y Carreon; Hubert Labelle; Mladen Djurasovic; Mark Weidenbaum; Courtney Brown; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Reliable and reproducible classification system for scoliotic radiograph using image processing techniques.

Authors:  H Anitha; G K Prabhu; A K Karunakar
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

10.  Inter- and intra-observer variability of a cervical OPLL classification using reconstructed CT images.

Authors:  Han Chang; Chae-Gwan Kong; Ho-Yeon Won; Ju-Hwan Kim; Jong-Beom Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.