Literature DB >> 20190995

Inter- and intra-observer variability of a cervical OPLL classification using reconstructed CT images.

Han Chang1, Chae-Gwan Kong, Ho-Yeon Won, Ju-Hwan Kim, Jong-Beom Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lateral radiograph-based system described by Tsuyama is used widely to classify ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine. However, OPLL is a complex 3-dimensional (3-D) lesion, not a simple and uniplanar one, which is often difficult to identify on a lateral radiograph. Furthermore, its reliability among spine surgeons has not been investigated. Given the popularity of a reconstructed computed tomography (CT), this study examined the inter- and intra-observer reliability of lateral radiograph-based OPLL classification using that modality.
METHODS: Five spine surgeons independently reviewed the lateral radiograph, axial CT, 2-D (sagittal) and 3-D reconstructed CT images of 108 OPLL patients on 2 separate occasions. Based on these images, the reviewers classified each OPLL case according to the Tsuyama's system. The kappa values were used to assess the statistical reliability.
RESULTS: The inter- and intra-observer kappa values were only 0.51 and 0.67 for the lateral radiograph, even in combination with the axial CT images, 0.70 and 0.85 for 2-D CT images, and 0.76 and 0.86 for 3-D CT images, respectively. These kappa values showed a good-to-excellent range for the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images while those of the lateral radiograph indicated a fair range. According to the OPLL types, the inter- and intra-observer reliability was low in the continuous type and high in the circumscribed type on the lateral radiograph. However, the low reliability of the continuous type on lateral radiograph was overcome somewhat using 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images.
CONCLUSIONS: The inter- and intra-observer kappa values were only 0.51 and 0.67 for the lateral radiograph, even in combination with the axial CT images, 0.70 and 0.85 for 2-D CT images, and 0.76 and 0.86 for 3-D CT images, respectively. These kappa values showed a good-to-excellent range for the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images while those of the lateral radiograph indicated a fair range. According to the OPLL types, the inter- and intra-observer reliability was low in the continuous type and high in the circumscribed type on the lateral radiograph. However, the low reliability of the continuous type on lateral radiograph was overcome somewhat using 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Computed tomography; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190995      PMCID: PMC2824098          DOI: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg        ISSN: 2005-291X


Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine is one of the most important causes of cervical myelopathy.1-4) The system described by Tsuyama (Investigation Committee on OPLL of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare) is the method most widely used for classifying cervical OPLL.5) Based only on the lateral radiograph and/or tomogram, cervical OPLL can be classified roughly into 4 types: continuous, segmental, mixed or circumscribed (localized or others). Although it is used widely, its reliability and reproducibility among spine surgeons are unknown. In addition, there are no reports on the the inter- and intra-observer reliability of Tsuyama's lateral radiograph-based classification of cervical OPLL. With the advent of a computed tomography (CT) reconstruction in treating cervical OPLL, it is believed that it is important to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of Tsuyama's lateral radiograph-based classification of a cervical OPLL using that modality.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2007, 2-dimensional (2-D) (sagittal) and 3-D CT reconstructions were performed in 108 patients exhibiting cervical OPLL on a plain lateral radiograph, axial CT and MRI. Eighty-two patients were male and 26 patients were female with a mean age of 53.7 years (range, 28 to 77 years). Of them, 48 patients underwent posterior, anterior, or combined surgery for myelopathy due to OPLL. However, 60 patients were carefully observed without surgery because they had mild or no symptoms. Five experienced cervical spine surgeons independently reviewed the lateral radiographs, axial CT images, and 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images of the 108 OPLL patients on 2 separate occasions. All the radiologic images were reviewed on a single day and then re-reviewed two weeks later in a different sequence. Based on the images, the reviewers classified each OPLL case into four types according to the OPLL classification reported by Tsuyama.5) The kappa values were used to examine the inter- and intra-observer reliability. According to Svanholm et al.,6) a kappa value > 0.75 represents excellent reliability; 0.5 to 0.75, fair-to-good reliability; and < 0.5, poor reliability.

RESULTS

The mean inter- and intra-observer reliability of the OPLL classification was only 64% and 77% for the lateral radiographs, respectively, even in combination with the axial CT images. The mean kappa values were 0.51 and 0.67, respectively, which indicates fair reliability. For the 2-D reconstructed CT images, the mean inter- and intra-observer reliability were 81% and 92% with mean kappa values of 0.71 and 0.85, respectively, which indicates good and excellent reliability. For the 3-D reconstructed CT images, the mean inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were 85% and 93% with mean kappa values of 0.76 and 0.86, respectively, which indicates excellent reliability (Table 1).
Table 1

Inter- and Intra-observer Reliabilities of Cervical OPLL Classification

OPLL: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

*Kappa value of more than 0.75 indicates excellent reliability; a value of 0.50 to 0.75, fair-to-good; and a value of less than 0.5, poor reliability.6)

The data was classified into four OPLL types. The inter-observer reliability of the OPLL classification was very low (17%) in the continuous type and high (88%) in the circumscribed type using the lateral radiograph in combination with the axial CT images. However, the very low inter-observer reliability of the lateral radiograph in combination with the axial CT images for the continuous type was overcome using the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images (62% and 73%, respectively) (Table 2). The intra-observer reliability of the OPLL classification was also low (50%) in the continuous type and high (91%) in the circumscribed type using the lateral radiograph in combination with the axial CT images. The low intra-observer reliability of the lateral radiograph in combination with the axial CT images for the continuous type was also overcome using the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images (79% and 84%, respectively) (Table 3).
Table 2

Inter-observer Reliability of Cervical OPLL Classification

OPLL: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Table 3

Intra-observer Reliability of Cervical OPLL Classification

OPLL: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

DISCUSSION

Classification systems are used to assess a clinical entity, enable a surgeon to recommend a particular treatment, and allow a comparison of different treatment modalities.7) For these purposes, classification systems must have high inter- and intra-observer reliability. The classification system described by Tsuyama5) is based only on a lateral radiograph and/or tomogram. Although it is used widely, its reliability and reproducibility among spine surgeons has not been determined. In addition, with the advent of CT reconstructions, it has been found that cervical OPLL is a 3-D complex lesion, not a simple and uni-plane. However, plain lateral radiographs cannot provide 3-D morphological structures of cervical OPLL accurately compared to reconstructed CT images. An accurate classification of the OPLL type is very important for determining the appropriate surgical approach, extent and need for additional fusion.8-11) Therefore, this study examined the inter- and intra-observer reliability of Tsuyama's lateral radiograph-based classification of the cervical spine using reconstructed CT. This study demonstrated that Tsuyama's lateral radiograph-based classification of cervical OPLL did not have sufficient inter- and intra-observer reliability among spine surgeons to portray the OPLL type accurately. The mean inter- and intra-observer kappa values of the lateral radiograph, even in combination with axial CT images, only indicated a fair range. However, in our cases, the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images demonstrated the anatomy of the 3-D complex OPLL lesions quite well. The mean inter- and intra-observer kappa values of the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images indicated excellent-to-good ranges. There were no significant differences between the 2-D and 3-D CT reconstruction, suggesting that either modality can be used reliably. According to the OPLL types, the inter- and intra-observer reliability in the lateral radiographs in combination with axial CT images was low in the continuous type and high in the circumscribed type. The greatest difficulty encountered by the reviewers was distinguishing the continuous type from the mixed type. However, this difficulty of the lateral radiographs in combination with the axial CT images was overcome somewhat using the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images. In particular, as shown in Fig. 1, most of the continuous types classified by the lateral radiograph in combination with the axial CT images were changed into the mixed type using the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images. The 3-D complex ossified structures of cervical OPLL were well described with the 2-D and 3-D reconstructed CT images. Therefore, it is important to classify cervical OPLL using reconstructed CT images. However, there are no reports classifying the OPLL type using reconstructed CT images. Therefore, this is the first study to determine the cervical OPLL type by 2-D and 3-D CT reconstructions. In conclusion, these results suggest that a lateral radiograph- based classification of cervical OPLL does not have sufficient inter- and intra-observer reliability to portray the OPLL type accurately. Therefore, 2-D and/or 3-D morphologic analysis of OPLL is recommended to determine the appropriate surgical approach, extent and need for additional fusion.
Fig. 1

Sixty-one-yr-old male patient presented with the typical clinical symptoms of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Most reviewers classified this case into the continuous type OPLL extending C1 to C7 using the lateral radiograph in combination with the axial CT images (A). However, the 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-D CT reconstructed images showed an interrupted OPLL at the C4-C5 disc level (arrow) (B). Most of the reviewers re-classified this case into the mixed type OPLL extending C1 to C7 using the reconstructed CT images.

  11 in total

1.  Extensive cervical laminoplasty for patients with long segment OPLL in the cervical spine: an alternative to the anterior approach.

Authors:  T Morimoto; R Uranishi; H Nakase; S Kawaguchi; T Hoshido; T Sakaki
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  Pathogenesis of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Makoto Kukita; Kyoji Hayashi; Reiko Shinkura; Chihaya Koriyama; Takashi Sakou; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic.

Authors:  H Svanholm; H Starklint; H J Gundersen; J Fabricius; H Barlebo; S Olsen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 4.  Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: management strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Junichi Mizuno; Hiroshi Nakagawa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Chiba; Yuto Ogawa; Ken Ishii; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Morio Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine.

Authors:  N Tsuyama
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; J Harms; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Radiological pathogenesis of cervical myelopathy in 60 consecutive patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Y Morio; H Nagashima; R Teshima; K Nawata
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Multisegmental cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior vs posterior approach.

Authors:  Subodh K Jain; Pravin S Salunke; K H Vyas; Sanjay S Behari; Deepu Banerji; Vijendra K Jain
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty.

Authors:  Motoki Iwasaki; Shin'ya Okuda; Akira Miyauchi; Hironobu Sakaura; Yoshihiro Mukai; Kazuo Yonenobu; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  12 in total

1.  Is ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament an enthesopathy?

Authors:  Jian Chen; Dianwen Song; Xinwei Wang; Xiaolong Shen; Yang Li; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Three-dimensional evaluation of volume change in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine using computed tomography.

Authors:  Tomohiro Izumi; Toru Hirano; Kei Watanabe; Atsuki Sano; Takui Ito; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kudo; Toru Yokoyama; Eiki Tsushima; Atsushi Ono; Takuya Numasawa; Kanichiro Wada; Sunao Tanaka; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Natural history of the ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament: a three dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Keiichi Katsumi; Kei Watanabe; Tomohiro Izumi; Toru Hirano; Masayuki Ohashi; Tatsuki Mizouchi; Takui Ito; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Risk factors for the development of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Guillaume Baucher; Jelena Taskovic; Lucas Troude; Granit Molliqaj; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (161). Cervical OPLL with cord compression.

Authors:  Wen Qi Tan; Bak Siew Steven Wong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a review of literature.

Authors:  Byung-Wan Choi; Kyung-Jin Song; Han Chang
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-11-28

8.  Improved diagnostic performance of plain radiography for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament using deep learning.

Authors:  Hee-Dong Chae; Sung Hwan Hong; Hyun Jung Yeoh; Yeo Ryang Kang; Su Min Lee; Minyoung Kim; Seok Young Koh; Yongeun Lee; Moo Sung Park; Ja-Young Choi; Hye Jin Yoo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Usefulness of multiecho fast field echo MRI in the evaluation of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and dural ossification of the cervical spine.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Yu Ri Shin; Hee Jin Park; Myung Ho Rho; Eun Chul Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability of the Volume of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Using Medical Image Processing Software.

Authors:  Dong Ah Shin; Gyu Yeul Ji; Chang Hyun Oh; Keung Nyun Kim; Do Heum Yoon; Hyunchul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.