Literature DB >> 9729748

Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan.

M J Reilly1, K D Rosenman, D J Kalinowski.   

Abstract

Occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is an important yet often overlooked illness that can affect an individual's safety and performance at work. This article describes a state-based surveillance system for occupational NIHL. The Michigan surveillance system enables us to describe the magnitude of occupational NIHL among Michigan workers and direct public health interventions in the form of enforcement workplace inspections. The data presented are based on interviews of individuals with occupational NIHL reported to the Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services (MDCIS) by Michigan's audiologists and otolaryngologists from 1992-1997. From 1992-1997, 1378 individuals with occupational NIHL were reported to the MDCIS and interviewed about their exposures to noise at work. Over 70% of the workplace noise exposure were in manufacturing. At the most recent company where these individuals were exposed to noise, approximately 46% were not provided regular hearing testing. Regular hearing testing was more likely to occur in the larger companies and in industries covered by regulations requiring such testing to be performed. There were improvements over time in the percentages of companies providing regular hearing testing and hearing protection. Construction workers are employees among a group of industries that are not adequately protected from excessive noise exposures by occupational regulations. Regular hearing testing was not provided for over 90% of construction jobs, although hearing protection such as earplugs or earmuffs was provided for approximately half of these jobs. Forty-three state enforcement inspections were conducted at the companies reported by the patients interviewed, because these companies were reported to provide no regular hearing testing or no hearing protection despite exposures to excessive levels of noise. During the 43 inspections, 23 companies had noise levels above dBA, and 17 of those had either no hearing conservation program (HCP) or had one that was cited as being incomplete. The inspections potentially protected 758 similarly exposed workers in the companies with the high noise levels that lacked an HCP or that had a deficient HCP. The number of patients with occupational NIHL is likely a gross underestimate of the true magnitude of the disease. However, the surveillance system has identified workplaces with hazardous levels of noise and no HCP, thereby protecting similarly exposed coworkers of the index patients from further exposures to noise and hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9729748     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199808000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  12 in total

1.  Awarding and promoting excellence in hearing loss prevention.

Authors:  Deanna K Meinke; Thais C Morata
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.

Authors:  W E Daniell; S S Swan; M M McDaniel; J E Camp; M A Cohen; J G Stebbins
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Longitudinal assessment of noise exposure in a cohort of construction workers.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Bert Stover; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-08-08

4.  Hearing loss among operating engineers in American construction industry.

Authors:  OiSaeng Hong
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H E Syddall; A Davis; B Pannett; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Unmet hearing health care needs: the Beaver Dam offspring study.

Authors:  Scott D Nash; Karen J Cruickshanks; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; Theodore S Tweed
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Sensory impairment among older US workers.

Authors:  Evelyn P Davila; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Peter Muennig; David J Lee; Lora E Fleming; Kenneth F Ferraro; William G LeBlanc; Byron L Lam; Kristopher L Arheart; Kathryn E McCollister; Diane Zheng; Sharon L Christ
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.

Authors:  Armando Carballo Pelegrin; Leonides Canuet; Ángeles Arias Rodríguez; Maria Pilar Arévalo Morales
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  The Effects of Earphone Use and Environmental Lead Exposure on Hearing Loss in the Korean Population: Data Analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2010-2013.

Authors:  Da-An Huh; Yun-Hee Choi; Kyong Whan Moon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Noise-induced hearing loss still a problem in shipbuilders: a cross-sectional study in goa, India.

Authors:  N Bhumika; Gv Prabhu; Am Ferreira; Mk Kulkarni
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.