Literature DB >> 12205239

Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain.

K T Palmer1, M J Griffin, H E Syddall, A Davis, B Pannett, D Coggon.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of self reported hearing difficulties and tinnitus in working aged people from the general population, and to estimate the risks from occupational exposure to noise and the number of attributable cases nationally.
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 22 194 adults of working age selected at random from the age-sex registers of 34 British general practices (21 201 subjects) and from the central pay records of the British armed services (993 subjects). Information was collected on years of employment in a noisy job; and whether the respondent wore a hearing aid, had difficulty in hearing conversation, or had experienced persistent tinnitus over the past year. Associations of hearing difficulty and tinnitus with noise exposure were examined by logistic regression, with adjustment for age, sex, smoking habits, and frequent complaints of headaches, tiredness, or stress. The findings were expressed as prevalence ratios (PRs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Attributable numbers were calculated from the relevant PRs and an estimate of the prevalence of occupational exposure to noise nationally.
RESULTS: Some 2% of subjects reported severe hearing difficulties (wearing a hearing aid or having great difficulty in both ears in hearing conversation in a quiet room). In men, the prevalence of this outcome rose steeply with age, from below 1% in those aged 16-24 years to 8% in those aged 55-64. The pattern was similar in women, but severe hearing loss was only about half as prevalent in the oldest age band. Tinnitus was far more common in subjects with hearing difficulties. In both sexes, after adjustment for age, the risk of severe hearing difficulty and persistent tinnitus rose with years spent in a noisy job. In men older than 35 years with 10 or more years of exposure, the PR for severe hearing difficulty was 3.8 (95% CI 2.4 to 6.2) and that for persistent tinnitus 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.4) in comparison with those who had never had a noisy job. Nationally, some 153 000 men and 26 000 women aged 35-64 years were estimated to have severe hearing difficulties attributable to noise at work. For persistent tinnitus the corresponding numbers were 266 000 and 84 000.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant hearing difficulties and tinnitus are quite common in men from the older working age range. Both are strongly associated with years spent in a noisy occupation--a predominantly male exposure. The national burden of hearing difficulties attributable to noise at work is substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12205239      PMCID: PMC1740364          DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.9.634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of the commoner ear, nose, and throat conditions in the adult rural population of Great Britain. A study by direct examination of two random samples.

Authors:  R HINCHCLIFFE
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1961-07

2.  Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers.

Authors:  S L Lusk; M J Kerr; S A Kauffman
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-07

3.  Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan.

Authors:  M J Reilly; K D Rosenman; D J Kalinowski
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Association between vibration-induced white finger and hearing loss in forestry workers.

Authors:  M Iki; N Kurumatani; K Hirata; T Moriyama; M Satoh; T Arai
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Smoking as a risk factor in noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  J A Barone; J M Peters; D H Garabrant; L Bernstein; R Krebsbach
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1987-09

6.  Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data.

Authors:  C Zocchetti; D Consonni; P A Bertazzi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Factors affecting the prevalence of tinnitus.

Authors:  D Y Chung; R P Gannon; K Mason
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1984

8.  Deafness in middle age--how big is the problem?

Authors:  M F D'Souza; L M Irwig; H T Trevelyan; A V Swan; D Shannon; E Tuckman; J T Woodall
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1975-07

9.  Prevalence and pattern of occupational exposure to hand transmitted vibration in Great Britain: findings from a national survey.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H Bendall; B Pannett; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Dose-response relationship between smoking and impairment of hearing acuity in workers exposed to noise.

Authors:  H Virokannas; H Anttonen
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1995
View more
  38 in total

1.  Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey.

Authors:  S Kock; T Andersen; H A Kolstad; B Kofoed-Nielsen; F Wiesler; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Cigarette smoking, occupational exposure to noise, and self reported hearing difficulties.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H E Syddall; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Predictive validity of a retrospective measure of noise exposure.

Authors:  R McNamee; G Burgess; W M Dippnall; N Cherry
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Occupational noise exposure and sensorineural hearing loss among workers of a steel rolling mill.

Authors:  Foluwasayo E Ologe; Tanimola M Akande; Toye G Olajide
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Assessing audiological, pathophysiological and psychological variables in tinnitus patients with or without hearing loss.

Authors:  Francesco Martines; Daniela Bentivegna; Enrico Martines; Vincenzo Sciacca; Gioacchino Martinciglio
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Vocational rehabilitation program for persons with occupational deafness.

Authors:  Eria Ping-Ying Li; Cecilia Wai-Ping Li-Tsang; Tsor-Kui Lee; Gladys Wai-Man Lee; Eddie Chi-Fung Lam
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

7.  Raynaud's phenomenon, vibration induced white finger, and difficulties in hearing.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H E Syddall; B Pannett; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Prevalence, Severity, Exposures, and Treatment Patterns of Tinnitus in the United States.

Authors:  Jay M Bhatt; Harrison W Lin; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Tinnitus with or without hearing loss: are its characteristics different?

Authors:  Marina Savastano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Clinical observations and risk factors for tinnitus in a Sicilian cohort.

Authors:  Francesco Martines; Federico Sireci; Emanuele Cannizzaro; Roberta Costanzo; Enrico Martines; Mariana Mucia; Fulvio Plescia; Pietro Salvago
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.