Literature DB >> 9727888

Stratifying patients at risk of diabetic complications: an integrated look at clinical, socioeconomic, and care-related factors. SID-AMD Italian Study Group for the Implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration.

A Nicolucci1, F Carinci, A Ciampi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify subgroups of patients for whom the interactions among clinical, socioeconomic, and care-related factors determine a substantial increase in the risk of developing long-term diabetic complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk factors for the development of major diabetic complications (eye, renal, and lower limb complications) in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 886 patients with renal, eye, or lower limb complications and 1,888 control subjects were enrolled in 35 diabetes outpatient clinics and 49 general practitioners' offices in 17 out of the 20 Italian regions. The main results were obtained using recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RECPAM), a technique that attempts to integrate the advantages of main effect logistic regression and tree-growing.
RESULTS: The application of RECPAM led to the detection of important interactions involving clinical, socioeconomic, and care-related characteristics and allowed the identification of internally homogeneous subgroups characterized by a marked difference in the risk of developing major complications. In type 1 diabetic patients, the interaction between hypertension and smoking habits led to a dramatic increase in the complication risk, while in type 2 diabetic subjects, a poor compliance with visit scheduling was the most important predictor of complications. Furthermore, a marked difference in the risk profile was associated with patient characteristics (age, years of education, occupation).
CONCLUSIONS: In the definition of the risk profile for each individual patient, socioeconomic status and level of education need to be taken under serious consideration, since they can determine a complication risk not dissimilar from hard clinical variables, such as hypertension and diabetes duration. Specific educational interventions, targeted to the socially disadvantaged strata of the population, need to be designed and implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9727888     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  9 in total

1.  Open-label randomized trial of titrated disease management for patients with hypertension: Study design and baseline sample characteristics.

Authors:  George L Jackson; Morris Weinberger; Miriam A Kirshner; Karen M Stechuchak; Stephanie D Melnyk; Hayden B Bosworth; Cynthia J Coffman; Brian Neelon; Courtney Van Houtven; Pamela W Gentry; Isis J Morris; Cynthia M Rose; Jennifer P Taylor; Carrie L May; Byungjoo Han; Christi Wainwright; Aviel Alkon; Lesa Powell; David Edelman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Classification and regression tree uncovered hierarchy of psychosocial determinants underlying quality-of-life response shift in HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Yuelin Li; Bruce Rapkin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Revascularization and cardioprotective drug treatment in myocardial infarction patients: how do they impact on patients' survival when delivered as usual care.

Authors:  Alain Vanasse; Josiane Courteau; Théophile Niyonsenga
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Psychosocial deprivation in women with gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with poor fetomaternal prognoses: an observational study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Cosson; Hélène Bihan; Gérard Reach; Laurence Vittaz; Lionel Carbillon; Paul Valensi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  p53, cathepsin D, Bcl-2 are joint prognostic indicators of breast cancer metastatic spreading.

Authors:  Emanuela Guerra; Alessia Cimadamore; Pasquale Simeone; Giovanna Vacca; Rossano Lattanzio; Gerardo Botti; Valentina Gatta; Marco D'Aurora; Barbara Simionati; Mauro Piantelli; Saverio Alberti
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Precariousness, Diabetes Control and Complications in French Guiana.

Authors:  Samuel Linière; Mathieu Nacher; Kinan Drak Alsibai; Mayka Mergeayfabre; Nezha Hafsi; Aurelie Charpin; Caroline Misslin-Tritsch; Jean-François Carod; Jean Markens Aurelus; Bertrand De Toffol; André Ntoutoum; John Bukasa Kakamba; Magalie Demar; Jeannie Helene-Pelage; Antoine Adenis; Nadia Sabbah
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.055

7.  Take Control of Your Blood Pressure (TCYB) study: a multifactorial tailored behavioral and educational intervention for achieving blood pressure control.

Authors:  Hayden B Bosworth; Maren K Olsen; Alice Neary; Melinda Orr; Janet Grubber; Laura Svetkey; Martha Adams; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-12-31

8.  A cluster randomized trial to improve adherence to evidence-based guidelines on diabetes and reduce clinical inertia in primary care physicians in Belgium: study protocol [NTR 1369].

Authors:  Liesbeth Borgermans; Geert Goderis; Carine Van Den Broeke; Chantal Mathieu; Bert Aertgeerts; Geert Verbeke; An Carbonez; Anna Ivanova; Richard Grol; Jan Heyrman
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Treatment beliefs, health behaviors and their association with treatment outcome in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lill-Brith Wium von Arx; Helge Gydesen; Søren Skovlund
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2016-04-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.