OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an RNA detection assay for diagnosing perinatal HIV infection. METHODS: Plasma and serum specimens taken during the first 3 months of life from HIV-infected and uninfected children enrolled in a cohort study were assayed for HIV RNA using the qualitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) kit. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. NASBA results from infected children were compared with DNA PCR results from the same blood samples. Autoantibody patterns of suspected false-positive specimens were compared with those of subsequent specimens from the same child to exclude specimen labelling errors. RESULTS: Amongst 131 specimens from 105 HIV-infected children, the sensitivity of the qualitative NASBA assay was 13 out of 34 [38%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 22-56] at < 7 days, 56 out of 58 (97%; 95% CI, 88-100) at 7-41 days, and 37 out of 39 (95%; 95% CI, 83-99) at 42-93 days of life. Of 252 specimens from 206 uninfected children, six tested positive and one tested indeterminate by NASBA. Four of these positive specimens had discordant autoantibody patterns suggesting mislabelling; excluding these, the test specificity was 245 out of 248 (99%; 95% CI, 97-100). Amongst 128 paired specimens from infected children, NASBA results were more often positive than those from DNA PCR (103 versus 92; P=0.01). Amongst infants with specimens drawn in the first week of life, the proportion born after > 4 h of membrane rupture was greater amongst those testing negative (81%) than those testing positive (46%; P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative NASBA RNA assay is highly specific and more sensitive than DNA PCR. Qualitative RNA assays may be useful for diagnosing and excluding perinatal HIV infection in children after the first week of life for such purposes as initiating antiretroviral therapy and other treatment, resolving parental uncertainty, determining timing of transmission, and providing endpoints for intervention trials.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an RNA detection assay for diagnosing perinatal HIV infection. METHODS: Plasma and serum specimens taken during the first 3 months of life from HIV-infected and uninfected children enrolled in a cohort study were assayed for HIV RNA using the qualitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) kit. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. NASBA results from infected children were compared with DNA PCR results from the same blood samples. Autoantibody patterns of suspected false-positive specimens were compared with those of subsequent specimens from the same child to exclude specimen labelling errors. RESULTS: Amongst 131 specimens from 105 HIV-infectedchildren, the sensitivity of the qualitative NASBA assay was 13 out of 34 [38%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 22-56] at < 7 days, 56 out of 58 (97%; 95% CI, 88-100) at 7-41 days, and 37 out of 39 (95%; 95% CI, 83-99) at 42-93 days of life. Of 252 specimens from 206 uninfected children, six tested positive and one tested indeterminate by NASBA. Four of these positive specimens had discordant autoantibody patterns suggesting mislabelling; excluding these, the test specificity was 245 out of 248 (99%; 95% CI, 97-100). Amongst 128 paired specimens from infected children, NASBA results were more often positive than those from DNA PCR (103 versus 92; P=0.01). Amongst infants with specimens drawn in the first week of life, the proportion born after > 4 h of membrane rupture was greater amongst those testing negative (81%) than those testing positive (46%; P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative NASBA RNA assay is highly specific and more sensitive than DNA PCR. Qualitative RNA assays may be useful for diagnosing and excluding perinatal HIV infection in children after the first week of life for such purposes as initiating antiretroviral therapy and other treatment, resolving parental uncertainty, determining timing of transmission, and providing endpoints for intervention trials.
Authors: Ada Cachafeiro; Gayle G Sherman; Annette H Sohn; Consuelo Beck-Sague; Susan A Fiscus Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Susan A Fiscus; Jeffrey Wiener; Elaine J Abrams; Marc Bulterys; Ada Cachafeiro; Richard A Respess Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-05-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jan Walter; Louise Kuhn; Katherine Semrau; Don W Decker; Moses Sinkala; Chipepo Kankasa; Donald M Thea; Marc Bulterys; Chin-Yih Ou; Grace M Aldrovandi Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mark M Manak; Holly R Hack; Ashley L Shutt; Brook A Danboise; Linda L Jagodzinski; Sheila A Peel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.948