Literature DB >> 9727045

Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation.

A Scheller1, E Hughes, K L Golden, D M Robins.   

Abstract

A critical problem within transcription factor families is how diverse regulatory programs are directed by highly related members. Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors (AR, GR) recognize a consensus DNA hormone response element (HRE), but they activate target genes with precise specificity, largely dependent on the promoter and cell context. We have assessed the role of different receptor domains in hormone-specific response by testing chimeras of AR and GR for their ability to activate the androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse sex-limited protein (Slp) gene. Although all of the mutant receptors activated simple HREs, only a few activated the androgen-specific element. One component shared by receptors functional on the AR-specific target was the AR DNA binding domain. Activation was not due to differential DNA affinity but rather to the AR DNA binding domain escaping suppression directed at the GR DNA binding domain in this enhancer context. A further mechanism increasing specific activation was cooperation of receptors at multiple and weak HREs, which was accentuated in the presence of both the AR N terminus and ligand binding domain. These domains together increased recognition of weak HREs, as demonstrated by in vitro DNase I footprinting and transactivation of mutant enhancers. Further, AR N-terminal subdomains reported to interact directly with the ligand binding domain relieved an inhibitory effect imposed by that domain. Therefore, functions intrinsic to AR augment steroid-specific gene activation, by evading negative regulation operating on the domains of other receptors and by enhancing cooperativity through intra- and inter-receptor domain interactions. These subtle distinctions in AR and GR behavior enforce transcriptional specificity established by the context of nonreceptor factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9727045     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.24216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  9 in total

1.  Differential DNA binding by the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors involves the second Zn-finger and a C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domains.

Authors:  E Schoenmakers; P Alen; G Verrijdt; B Peeters; G Verhoeven; W Rombauts; F Claessens
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  A common motif within the negative regulatory regions of multiple factors inhibits their transcriptional synergy.

Authors:  J A Iñiguez-Lluhí; D Pearce
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The AF1 and AF2 domains of the androgen receptor interact with distinct regions of SRC1.

Authors:  C L Bevan; S Hoare; F Claessens; D M Heery; M G Parker
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  A natural sequence consisting of overlapping glucocorticoid-responsive elements mediates glucocorticoid, but not androgen, regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  C Massaad; M Garlatti; E M Wilson; F Cadepond; R Barouki
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Identification and characterization of ART-27, a novel coactivator for the androgen receptor N terminus.

Authors:  Steven M Markus; Samir S Taneja; Susan K Logan; Wenhui Li; Susan Ha; Adam B Hittelman; Inez Rogatsky; Michael J Garabedian
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Androgen regulation of the TMPRSS2 gene and the effect of a SNP in an androgen response element.

Authors:  Liesbeth Clinckemalie; Lien Spans; Vanessa Dubois; Michaël Laurent; Christine Helsen; Steven Joniau; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-10-09

7.  Androgen receptor uses relaxed response element stringency for selective chromatin binding and transcriptional regulation in vivo.

Authors:  Biswajyoti Sahu; Päivi Pihlajamaa; Vanessa Dubois; Stefanie Kerkhofs; Frank Claessens; Olli A Jänne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Loss of androgen receptor binding to selective androgen response elements causes a reproductive phenotype in a knockin mouse model.

Authors:  Kris Schauwaers; Karel De Gendt; Philippa T K Saunders; Nina Atanassova; Annemie Haelens; Leen Callewaert; Udo Moehren; Johannes V Swinnen; Guido Verhoeven; Guy Verrijdt; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Gender differences in cancer susceptibility: an inadequately addressed issue.

Authors:  M Tevfik Dorak; Ebru Karpuzoglu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.