Literature DB >> 10913186

A common motif within the negative regulatory regions of multiple factors inhibits their transcriptional synergy.

J A Iñiguez-Lluhí1, D Pearce.   

Abstract

DNA regulatory elements frequently harbor multiple recognition sites for several transcriptional activators. The response mounted from such compound response elements is often more pronounced than the simple sum of effects observed at single binding sites. The determinants of such transcriptional synergy and its control, however, are poorly understood. Through a genetic approach, we have uncovered a novel protein motif that limits the transcriptional synergy of multiple DNA-binding regulators. Disruption of these conserved synergy control motifs (SC motifs) selectively increases activity at compound, but not single, response elements. Although isolated SC motifs do not regulate transcription when tethered to DNA, their transfer to an activator lacking them is sufficient to impose limits on synergy. Mechanistic analysis of the two SC motifs found in the glucocorticoid receptor N-terminal region reveals that they function irrespective of the arrangement of the receptor binding sites or their distance from the transcription start site. Proper function, however, requires the receptor's ligand-binding domain and an engaged dimer interface. Notably, the motifs are not functional in yeast and do not alter the effect of p160 coactivators, suggesting that they require other nonconserved components to operate. Many activators across multiple classes harbor seemingly unrelated negative regulatory regions. The presence of SC motifs within them, however, suggests a common function and identifies SC motifs as critical elements of a general mechanism to modulate higher-order interactions among transcriptional regulators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913186      PMCID: PMC86080          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.16.6040-6050.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  58 in total

1.  In two genes, synergism of steroid hormone action is not mediated by cooperative binding of receptors to adjacent sites.

Authors:  A Bailly; C Rauch; A C Cato; E Milgrom
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  Extreme position dependence of a canonical hormone response element.

Authors:  S K Nordeen; C A Ogden; L Taraseviciene; B A Lieberman
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1998-06

Review 3.  The enhanceosome and transcriptional synergy.

Authors:  M Carey
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-01-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Definition of a negative modulation domain in the human progesterone receptor.

Authors:  B Huse; S B Verca; P Matthey; S Rusconi
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1998-09

5.  Truncated c-Myb expression in the human leukemia cell line TK-6.

Authors:  A Tomita; T Watanabe; H Kosugi; H Ohashi; T Uchida; T Kinoshita; S Mizutani; T Hotta; T Murate; M Seto; H Saito
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  The C-terminal domain of B-Myb acts as a positive regulator of transcription and modulates its biological functions.

Authors:  I H Oh; E P Reddy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Multiple receptor domains interact to permit, or restrict, androgen-specific gene activation.

Authors:  A Scheller; E Hughes; K L Golden; D M Robins
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-09-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Acetylation and modulation of erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF) activity by interaction with histone acetyltransferases.

Authors:  W Zhang; J J Bieker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Identification of transcriptional activation and repression domains in human CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein epsilon.

Authors:  E A Williamson; H N Xu; A F Gombart; W Verbeek; A M Chumakov; A D Friedman; H P Koeffler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-06-12       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  The mechanism of transcriptional synergy of an in vitro assembled interferon-beta enhanceosome.

Authors:  T K Kim; T Maniatis
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  60 in total

Review 1.  Modification with SUMO. A role in transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Alexis Verger; José Perdomo; Merlin Crossley
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Direct and distinguishable inhibitory roles for SUMO isoforms in the control of transcriptional synergy.

Authors:  Sam Holmstrom; Mary E Van Antwerp; Jorge A Iñiguez-Lluhi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The ETS domain transcription factor Elk-1 contains a novel class of repression domain.

Authors:  Shen-Hsi Yang; Donna C Bumpass; Neil D Perkins; Andrew D Sharrocks
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification mediates function of the inhibitory domains of developmental regulators FOXC1 and FOXC2.

Authors:  Theodora E Danciu; Sergey Chupreta; Osvaldo Cruz; Jennifer E Fox; Malcolm Whitman; Jorge A Iñiguez-Lluhí
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A small conserved surface in SUMO is the critical structural determinant of its transcriptional inhibitory properties.

Authors:  Sergey Chupreta; Sam Holmstrom; Lalitha Subramanian; Jorge A Iñiguez-Lluhí
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Negative modulation of androgen receptor transcriptional activity by Daxx.

Authors:  Ding-Yen Lin; Hsin-I Fang; Ai-Hong Ma; Yen-Sung Huang; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Guido Jenster; Hsing-Jien Kung; Hsiu-Ming Shih
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Association with class IIa histone deacetylases upregulates the sumoylation of MEF2 transcription factors.

Authors:  Serge Grégoire; Xiang-Jiao Yang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Phosphorylation and intramolecular stabilization of the ligand binding domain in the nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1.

Authors:  Marion Desclozeaux; Irina N Krylova; Florence Horn; Robert J Fletterick; Holly A Ingraham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Comparison of TFII-I gene family members deleted in Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  Timothy A Hinsley; Pamela Cunliffe; Hannah J Tipney; Andrew Brass; May Tassabehji
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  SUMO-mediated inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor synergistic activity depends on stable assembly at the promoter but not on DAXX.

Authors:  Sam R Holmstrom; Sergey Chupreta; Alex Yick-Lun So; Jorge A Iñiguez-Lluhí
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.