Literature DB >> 9725273

1998 ARRS Executive Council Award. Radiology in the emergency department: technique for quantitative description of use and results. American Roentgen Ray Society.

S I Lee1, F S Chew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop quantitative methods to describe the use and results of imaging studies in emergency department patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerized nonrelational database containing records of 3.5 million diagnostic reports generated by our radiology department from 1988 to 1997 was queried using Boolean and natural language search tools. Each record contained data fields for patient demographics, examination description and billing code, names of interpreting radiologists and referring physicians, patient history, report body, and report impression.
RESULTS: Emergency department admissions and imaging studies were stable from 1991 to 1997, averaging 60,000 and 52,000 per year, respectively. Bone radiographs comprised 45.1% of examinations; chest radiographs, 44.6%; and abdominal radiographs, 10.4%. The percentages of radiographs interpreted as normal were 75.9% in 1992 and 75.3% in 1996, with cervical spine (88.7%), thoracic spine (86.3%), and knee (86.3%) yielding the highest proportion of studies with normal findings. The number of CT studies of the body increased from 1840 in 1993 to 3101 in 1997. Studies of the abdomen accounted for most of this increase (52.3% in 1993 to 66.0% in 1997). During evaluations for cervical spine injury, a mean of 6.5% of radiographic studies were followed by CT studies, and the findings of 89.0% of those CT studies were interpreted as normal.
CONCLUSION: Radiology report databases represent a resource from which broad descriptions of the use and results of imaging studies can be obtained. Such descriptions may be useful in departmental and hospital administration, technology assessment, cost-effectiveness studies, and health policy formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9725273     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

1.  Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis.

Authors:  Robin B Levenson; Marc A Camacho; Erin Horn; Amina Saghir; Daniel McGillicuddy; Leon D Sanchez
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29

2.  The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety.

Authors:  Seyed Amirhossein Razavi; Jamlik-Omari Johnson; Michael T Kassin; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-06

3.  Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast.

Authors:  Ly N Huynh; Bret F Coughlin; Jeannette Wolfe; Fidela Blank; Steve Y Lee; Howard A Smithline
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-29

4.  Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Grant Chu; Andrew Sucov
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-20

5.  Re-examining the association of os acromiale with supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears.

Authors:  H Ouellette; B J Thomas; A Kassarjian; B Fritz; P Tétreault; W E Palmer; M Torriani
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.