Literature DB >> 9725149

Stent dilation of superior vena cava and innominate vein obstructions permits transvenous pacing lead implantation.

F F Ing1, C E Mullins, R G Grifka, M R Nihill, A L Fenrich, E L Collins, R A Friedman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of stent dilation of venous obstructions/occlusions to permit transvenous pacing lead implantation. Innominate vein or superior vena cava (SVG) obstruction may preclude the implantation of transvenous pacing leads. Patients with d-transposition of the great arteries, after a Mustard or Senning procedure, and children with previously placed transvenous pacing leads are at higher risk for this vascular complication. From May 1993 to January 1996, eight pediatric patients who underwent transvenous pacing lead implantation or replacement were found to have significant innominate vein or SVC obstruction or occlusion. Utilizing intravascular stents, a combined interventional and electrophysiological approach was used to relieve the venous obstruction and to permit implantation of a new transvenous pacing lead. Two patients had complete SVC occlusion requiring puncture through the obstruction with a transseptal needle. Vessel recanalization was achieved with balloon dilation and stent implantation. The remaining six patients had severe venous obstruction with a mean minimum diameter of 3.1 +/- 3.3 mm. The mean pressure gradient across the obstructed veins was 8.6 +/- 7.3 mmHg. Following implantation of 15 Palmaz P308 stents in eight vessels, the mean diameter increased to 14.2 +/- 1.9 mm and the mean pressure gradient across the stented vessels decreased to 1.0 +/- 2.0 mmHg. A transvenous pacing lead was implanted successfully through the stent(s) immediately or 6-8 weeks later. Innominate vein and SVC obstruction can be safely and effectively relieved with intravascular stents and permit immediate or subsequent transvenous pacing lead implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9725149     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00238.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Exchange of pacing or defibrillator leads following laser sheath extraction of non-functional leads in patients with ipsilateral obstructed venous access.

Authors:  F A Bracke; L M van Gelder; N Sreeram; A Meijer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Special problems of pacing in children.

Authors:  Herwig Antretter; Joshua Colvin; Ulli Schweigmann; Herbert Hangler; Daniel Hofer; Karin Dunst; Josef Margreiter; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-01-01

Review 4.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 2: Complications and indications.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Superior vena cava stenting and transvenous pacemaker implantation (stent and pace) after the Mustard operation.

Authors:  Mathias Emmel; Narayanswami Sreeram; Konrad Brockmeier; Gerardus Bennink
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 5.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.