OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive preoperative functional imaging data used in an interactive fashion in the operating room. The authors describe a method of registering preoperative functional magnetic resonance (fMR) imaging localization of sensorimotor cortex with a frameless stereotactic surgical navigation device. METHODS: The day before surgery, patients underwent blood oxygen level-dependent fMR imaging while performing a finger-tapping motor paradigm. Immediately afterward an anatomical stereotactic MR image was acquired. Raw fMR imaging data were analyzed offline at a separate workstation, and the resulting functional maps were registered to a high-resolution anatomical scan. The fused functional-anatomical images were then downloaded onto a surgical navigation computer via an ethernet connection. At surgery, the brain was exposed in the standard fashion, and the sensorimotor cortex was identified by direct cortical stimulation, the use of somatosensory evoked potentials, or both. This localization was then compared with that predicted by the registered fMR study. Thirteen procedures were performed in 12 patients. The mean registration error was 2.2 mm. The predicted location of motor and/or sensory cortex matched that found on intraoperative mapping in all 12 patients tested. Maximal tumor resection was accomplished in each case and no new permanent neurological deficits resulted. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional brain mapping techniques, fMR image-guided surgery may allow for smaller brain exposures, localization of the language cortex with the patient under general anesthesia, and the mapping of multiple functional sites. The scanning equipment used in this method may be more readily available than for other functional imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography or magnetoencephalography.
OBJECT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive preoperative functional imaging data used in an interactive fashion in the operating room. The authors describe a method of registering preoperative functional magnetic resonance (fMR) imaging localization of sensorimotor cortex with a frameless stereotactic surgical navigation device. METHODS: The day before surgery, patients underwent blood oxygen level-dependent fMR imaging while performing a finger-tapping motor paradigm. Immediately afterward an anatomical stereotactic MR image was acquired. Raw fMR imaging data were analyzed offline at a separate workstation, and the resulting functional maps were registered to a high-resolution anatomical scan. The fused functional-anatomical images were then downloaded onto a surgical navigation computer via an ethernet connection. At surgery, the brain was exposed in the standard fashion, and the sensorimotor cortex was identified by direct cortical stimulation, the use of somatosensory evoked potentials, or both. This localization was then compared with that predicted by the registered fMR study. Thirteen procedures were performed in 12 patients. The mean registration error was 2.2 mm. The predicted location of motor and/or sensory cortex matched that found on intraoperative mapping in all 12 patients tested. Maximal tumor resection was accomplished in each case and no new permanent neurological deficits resulted. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional brain mapping techniques, fMR image-guided surgery may allow for smaller brain exposures, localization of the language cortex with the patient under general anesthesia, and the mapping of multiple functional sites. The scanning equipment used in this method may be more readily available than for other functional imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography or magnetoencephalography.
Authors: T Krings; M Schreckenberger; V Rohde; H Foltys; U Spetzger; O Sabri; M H Reinges; S Kemeny; P T Meyer; W Möller-Hartmann; M Korinth; J M Gilsbach; U Buell; A Thron Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: T Krings; M H Reinges; S Erberich; S Kemeny; V Rohde; U Spetzger; M Korinth; K Willmes; J M Gilsbach; A Thron Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: F E Roux; K Boulanouar; D Ibarrola; M Tremoulet; F Chollet; I Berry Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Lance Driskill; Jonathan H Burdette Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Michael J J Kim; Andrei I Holodny; Bob L Hou; Kyung K Peck; Chaya S Moskowitz; Dmitry L Bogomolny; Philip H Gutin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Smits; M W Vernooij; P A Wielopolski; A J P E Vincent; G C Houston; A van der Lugt Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nolan Ung; Monica Mathur; Lawrance K Chung; Nicole Cremer; Panayiotis Pelargos; Andrew Frew; Kimberly Thill; Ishani Mathur; Brittany Voth; Michael Lim; Isaac Yang Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2016-01-04
Authors: Jan Coburger; Christian Musahl; Hans Henkes; Diana Horvath-Rizea; Markus Bittl; Claudia Weissbach; Nikolai Hopf Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 3.042