Literature DB >> 9723632

Predictors of fluoroscopy time and estimated radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures.

L S Rosenthal1, M Mahesh, T J Beck, J P Saul, J M Miller, N Kay, L S Klein, S Huang, P Gillette, E Prystowsky, M Carlson, R D Berger, J H Lawrence, P Yong, H Calkins.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify factors that predict fluoroscopy duration and radiation exposure during catheter ablation procedures. The patient population included 859 patients who participated in the Atakr Ablation System clinical trial at 1 of 9 centers (398 male and 461 female patients, aged 36 +/- 21 years). Each patient underwent catheter ablation of an accessory pathway, the atrioventricular junction, or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using standard techniques. The duration of fluoroscopy was 53 +/- 50 minutes. Factors identified as independent predictors of fluoroscopy duration included patient age and sex, the success or failure of the ablation procedure, and the institution at which the ablation was performed. Catheter ablation in adults required longer fluoroscopy exposure than it did in children. Men required longer durations of fluoroscopy exposure than did women. The mean estimated "entrance" radiation dose was 1.3 +/- 1.3 Sv. The dose needed to cause radiation skin injury was exceeded during 22% of procedures. The overall mean effective absorbed dose from catheter ablation procedures was 0.025 Sv for female patients and 0.017 Sv for male patients. This degree of radiation exposure would result in an estimated 1,400 excess fatal malignancies in female patients and 2,600 excess fatal malignancies in male patients per 1 million patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9723632     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00356-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  21 in total

1.  Stereotactic magnetic resonance guidance for anatomically targeted ablations of the fossa ovalis and the left atrium.

Authors:  Timm Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Menekhem Zviman; Glenn Meininger; Lars Lickfett; Ariel Roguin; Albert C Lardo; Ronald Berger; Henry Halperin; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Application of registration for ablation: a marriage of technologies.

Authors:  John M Miller
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Quantifying and minimizing radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  R M Campbell; M J Strieper; P A Frias; G Jeager; G Balfour; L Costello; K M Sullivan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  First in vivo use of a capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer array-based imaging and ablation catheter.

Authors:  Douglas N Stephens; Uyen T Truong; Amin Nikoozadeh; Omer Oralkan; Chi Hyung Seo; Jonathan Cannata; Aaron Dentinger; Kai Thomenius; Alan de la Rama; Tho Nguyen; Feng Lin; Pierre Khuri-Yakub; Aman Mahajan; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Matt O'Donnell; David J Sahn
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Success rate of catheter ablation in atrial flutter: comparison of a 4- or 5-mm tip electrode catheter with an 8-mm tip electrode catheter.

Authors:  Sucheta Gosavi; Greg Flaker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Heart Rythm Society expert consensus statement on electrophysiology laboratory standards: process, protocols, equipment, personnel, and safety.

Authors:  David E Haines; Salwa Beheiry; Joseph G Akar; Janice L Baker; Doug Beinborn; John F Beshai; Neil Brysiewicz; Christine Chiu-Man; Kathryn K Collins; Matthew Dare; Kenneth Fetterly; John D Fisher; Richard Hongo; Samuel Irefin; John Lopez; John M Miller; James C Perry; David J Slotwiner; Gery F Tomassoni; Esther Weiss
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Contrast in intracardiac acoustic radiation force impulse images of radiofrequency ablation lesions.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eyerly; Tristram D Bahnson; Jason I Koontz; David P Bradway; Douglas M Dumont; Gregg E Trahey; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Advanced electrophysiologic mapping systems: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-03-01

10.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.