Literature DB >> 972186

Clinical laboratory evaluation of the fifty-milliliter vacutainer blood culture tube.

B G Painter, H D Isenberg.   

Abstract

The efficacy of the 50-ml vacutainer culture tube (Becton-Dickinson) for recovery of microorganisms from blood cultures was compared with laboratory-prepared blood culture media. The isolation of Bacteroides sp. was significantly higher in the 50-ml vacutainer culture tube whereas that of nonfermenting gram-negative rods and yeasts was higher in the in-house media. There was no significant difference in the recovery of all other organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 972186      PMCID: PMC274141     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  Effect of aerobic and anaerobic atmospheres on isolation of organisms from blood cultures.

Authors:  D J Blazevic; J E Stemper; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The comparison of percentages in matched samples.

Authors:  W G COCHRAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1950-12       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Comparison of two commercially available media for detection of bacteremia.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-10

4.  Bacteremia after genitourinary tract manipulation: bacteriological aspects and evaluation of various blood culture systems.

Authors:  N M Sullivan; V L Sutter; W T Carter; H R Attebery; S M Finegold
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-06

5.  Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia.

Authors:  S M Finegold; M L White; I Ziment; W R Winn
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-09

6.  Comparison of two liquid blood culture media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate: tryptic soy and Columbia.

Authors:  M Hall; E Warren; J A Washington
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-04
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of three different commercial blood culture media for recovery of anaerobic organisms.

Authors:  J I Mangels; L H Lindberg; K L Vosti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  In vitro comparison of fluid blood culture media.

Authors:  C Simon; G Kreller; A Bahr; D Kiosz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Evaluation of twenty-three blood culture media.

Authors:  J P Babu; R F Schell; J L Le Frock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative evaluation of different types of blood culture media for isolation of aerobes.

Authors:  P A Gross; R Fryda; K Reilly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Variability in CO2, O2, and pH levels in blood culture bottles from five different manufacturers.

Authors:  W D Welch; R K Porschen; S Z Zarifi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Analysis of bacterial isolates from cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  D A Olson; P D Hoeprich
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Growth of Haemophilus influenzae in simulated blood cultures supplemented with hemin and NAD.

Authors:  M Artman; E Domenech; M Weiner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.