Literature DB >> 701464

Evaluation of twenty-three blood culture media.

J P Babu, R F Schell, J L Le Frock.   

Abstract

Several investigators have evaluated clinically a variety of commercially available blood culture media. No agreement has been reached as to which of these media is optimal for detection of bacteremia. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of recovery of microorganisms from various blood culture media. A total of 23 blood culture media were inoculated with 7 to 15 microorganisms per bottle in the presence or absence of an erythrocyte-serum mixture. The results demonstrated that blood culture media differed in their ability to support the growth of microorganisms. At 4 days after inoculation, only 10 of the 23 blood culture media supported the growth of 91% (10 of the 11) or more of the test microorganisms. The recovery rate of microorganisms depended not only upon the type of medium but also upon the manufacturer of the type of blood culture medium. The addition of an erythrocyte-serum mixture to the blood culture media did not influence the difference in the recovery rate of microorganisms among media and the same type of medium prepared by different manufacturers. The majority (15 of the 23) of the blood culture media supplemented with the erythrocyte-serum mixture failed to support the growth of 91% or more of the test microorganisms at 4 days after inoculation. These results have demonstrated that blood culture media need to be improved. Better quality control measures should also be implemented to evaluate commercial blood culture media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 701464      PMCID: PMC275233          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.8.3.288-292.1978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Blood culture; a clinical laboratory study of two methods.

Authors:  V CONNER; O T MALLERY
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1951-08       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the fifty-milliliter vacutainer blood culture tube.

Authors:  B G Painter; H D Isenberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of two blood culture systems.

Authors:  H P Dalton; R Kammer; M R Escobar; M J Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  A quantitative evaluation of three blood culture systems.

Authors:  R Rosner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in minor wounds requiring suture.

Authors:  T K Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Evaluation of two commercially available media for detection of bacteremia.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-05

7.  Comparative evaluation of different types of blood culture media for isolation of aerobes.

Authors:  P A Gross; R Fryda; K Reilly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  A single-bottle blood culture system: evaluation and comparison with two other systems.

Authors:  S M Qadri; R D Wende
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia.

Authors:  S M Finegold; M L White; I Ziment; W R Winn
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-09

10.  Comparison of two liquid blood culture media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate: tryptic soy and Columbia.

Authors:  M Hall; E Warren; J A Washington
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-04
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: where do we stand?

Authors:  R C Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Risk analysis. Its application to the protection of the consumer against food-transmitted diseases of microbial aetiology [proceedings].

Authors:  D A Mossel; E F Drion
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Detection time for blood culture isolates using a biphasic medium.

Authors:  I G Julander; M Kalin; L Sjöberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  In vitro comparison of fluid blood culture media.

Authors:  C Simon; G Kreller; A Bahr; D Kiosz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Detection and quantitation of simulated anaerobic bacteremia by centrifugation and filtration.

Authors:  R E Lamberg; R F Schell; J L LeFrock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid detection of simulated bacteremia by centrifugation and filtration.

Authors:  M B Herlich; R F Schell; M Francisco; J L Le Frock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Recovery of Haemophilus influenzae from twenty-three blood culture media.

Authors:  R F Schell; J L Le Frock; J P Babu; D B Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Growth of Haemophilus influenzae in simulated blood cultures supplemented with hemin and NAD.

Authors:  M Artman; E Domenech; M Weiner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  New biphasic culture system for isolation of mycobacteria from blood of patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  O G Berlin; P Zakowski; D A Bruckner; B L Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.