Literature DB >> 9718501

Establishing the level of digitization for wrist and hand radiographs for the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Y Ostchega1, L R Long, G H Goh, R Hirsch, L D Ma, W W Scott, W Johnson, G R Thoma.   

Abstract

In the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, radiographs of the hands and knees were taken of participants 60 years and older as part of the study of arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions. The purpose of the study was to decide the digitizing resolution to be used for these radiographs. A set of wrist and hand radiographs (N = 49) was graded by two radiologists for degree of bone erosions and served as a "gold standard." The radiographs were then digitized at three resolution levels; low-resolution 150 microns (2001 x 1634 x 12 bit matrix); intermediate-resolution 100 microns (3000 x 2400 x 12 bit matrix); and high-resolution 50 microns (4900 x 3000 x 12 bit matrix). A comparison of the digital images versus the gold standard reading was made at the three resolutions by two radiologists. Kappa statistics suggested fair (K > .4) to excellent (K > .75) agreement between the gold standard and the images at all levels. Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested high agreement between readers (ICC > .5), with minimal individual reader effect. Variance component estimates showed that the major contribution (78-83%) to scoring came from variability in the images themselves, not from the readers. The 100 microns resolution was selected over the 150 and 50 microns on the basis of practical considerations such as storage requirements, display time, and easier manipulation of the digital images by the readers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718501      PMCID: PMC3453200          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  High incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Pima Indians.

Authors:  A Del Puente; W C Knowler; D J Pettitt; P H Bennett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis.

Authors:  A Jónsson; A Borg; P Hannesson; K Herrlin; K Jonsson; M Sloth; H Petterson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  A cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of the Rome criteria for active rheumatoid arthritis (equivalent to the American College of Rheumatology 1958 criteria) and the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L T Jacobsson; W C Knowler; S Pillemer; R L Hanson; D J Pettitt; D R McCance; P H Bennett
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1994-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.