Literature DB >> 9718201

Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density measurements: a twin study.

G M Howard1, T V Nguyen, M Harris, P J Kelly, J A Eisman.   

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty-nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 +/- 13 years, mean +/- SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model-fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age- and weight-adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross-sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p < 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p < 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p < 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718201     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  36 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound of the skeleton: review of its clinical applications and pitfalls.

Authors:  R D Danese; A A Licata
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Genome-wide association of an integrated osteoporosis-related phenotype: is there evidence for pleiotropic genes?

Authors:  David Karasik; Ching Lung Cheung; Yanhua Zhou; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Serkalem Demissie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Genetic variation in TRPS1 may regulate hip geometry as well as bone mineral density.

Authors:  Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Serkalem Demissie; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Wesley G Beamer; L Adrienne Cupples; Beverly J Paigen; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Douglas P Kiel; David Karasik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Polymorphisms of the WNT16 gene are associated with the heel ultrasound parameter in young adults.

Authors:  M Correa-Rodríguez; J Schmidt Rio-Valle; B Rueda-Medina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Association of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms and lifestyle factors with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and osteoporosis in postmenopausal Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Tran Quang Binh; Toshikatsu Shinka; Nguyen Cong Khan; Vu Thi Thu Hien; Nguyen Thi Lam; Le Bach Mai; Takuro Nakano; Masako Sei; Shigeru Yamamoto; Masayo Nakamori; Yutaka Nakahori
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Association of polymorphisms of the androgen receptor and klotho genes with bone mineral density in Japanese women.

Authors:  Yoshiji Yamada; Fujiko Ando; Naoakira Niino; Hiroshi Shimokata
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Genetic determination and correlation of body mass index and bone mineral density at the spine and hip in Chinese Han ethnicity.

Authors:  Fei-Yan Deng; Shu-Feng Lei; Miao-Xin Li; Cheng Jiang; Volodymyr Dvornyk; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Genetic profiling and individualized assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanges in a cohort of monozygotic twins of different ages.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Francesca De Terlizzi; Michelangelo Nasuto; Lorenzo Sinibaldi; Francesco Brancati
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Association of oestrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with postmenopausal bone loss, bone mass, and quantitative ultrasound properties of bone.

Authors:  O M E Albagha; U Pettersson; A Stewart; F E A McGuigan; H M MacDonald; D M Reid; S H Ralston
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.