Literature DB >> 9717992

Physiological and functional outcome following ultra-low anterior resection with colon pouch-anal anastomosis.

N Williams1, F Seow-Choen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low rectal cancer is usually managed by ultra-low anterior resection (ULAR) with total mesorectal excision and straight coloanal anastomosis. However, following this procedure patients often suffer from frequency, urgency of bowel action and, occasionally, faecal incontinence. To overcome such problems, a colon pouch may be fashioned and a subsequent colon pouch-anal anastomosis performed. The physiological and functional outcome following the use of a colon pouch are appraised.
METHODS: All relevant papers identified from a Medline search and papers from cross-referencing were reviewed. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Creation of a colon pouch following ULAR results in reduced bowel frequency, and a lower incidence of urgency and faecal incontinence. Although there is a slightly increased incidence of evacuatory disorder and need for enemas or suppositories, this appears to be a minor problem which may possibly be overcome by using a smaller colon pouch. Compared with straight coloanal anastomosis following ULAR, the creation of a colon pouch produced a superior functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9717992     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00804.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  16 in total

Review 1.  Total mesorectal excision: technical aspects.

Authors:  P Terry Phang
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Total mesorectal excision: what are we doing?

Authors:  David B Stewart; David W Dietz
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

4.  Patient expectations of functional outcomes after rectal cancer surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jason Park; Heather B Neuman; Antonia V Bennett; Lily Polskin; P Terry Phang; W Douglas Wong; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Gahb Park; Min-Ro Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang-Won Hong; Sang-Nam Yoon; Sung-Bum Kang; Seung-Chul Heo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu-Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

7.  In the beginning there was colectomy: current surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Daniel R McGrath; Allan D Spigelman
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  Retrograde colonic irrigation for faecal incontinence after low anterior resection.

Authors:  S M P Koch; M P Rietveld; B Govaert; W G van Gemert; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Mikael Machado; Jonas Nygren; Sven Goldman; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Radical surgery for early colorectal cancer--anachronism or oncologic necessity?

Authors:  Franz Georg Bader; Uwe Johannes Roblick; Elisabeth Oevermann; Hans-Peter Bruch; Oliver Schwandner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.