Literature DB >> 24401875

Patient expectations of functional outcomes after rectal cancer surgery: a qualitative study.

Jason Park1, Heather B Neuman, Antonia V Bennett, Lily Polskin, P Terry Phang, W Douglas Wong, Larissa K Temple.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients' expectations of health and function may affect their disease- and treatment-related experience, but how patients form expectations of postsurgery function has received little study.
OBJECTIVE: We used a qualitative approach to explore patient expectations of outcomes related to bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
DESIGN: This was a cohort study of patients who were about to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. SETTINGS: The study was conducted through individual telephone interviews with participants. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients (14 men and 12 women) with clinical TNM stage I to III disease were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The semistructured interview script contained open-ended questions on patient expectations of postoperative bowel function and its perceived impact on daily function and life. Two researchers analyzed the interview transcripts for emergent themes using a grounded theory approach.
RESULTS: Participant expectations of bowel function reflected 3 major themes: 1) information sources, 2) personal attitudes, and 3) expected outcomes. The expected outcomes theme contained references to specific symptoms and participants' descriptions of the certainty, importance, and imminence of expected outcomes. Despite multiple information sources and attempts at maintaining a positive personal attitude, participants expressed much uncertainty about their long-term bowel function. They were more focused on what they considered more important and imminent concerns about being cancer free and getting through surgery. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by context in terms of the timing of interviews (relative to the treatment course). The transferability to other contexts requires further study.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient expectations of long-term functional outcomes cannot be considered outside of the overall context of the cancer experience and the relative importance and imminence of cancer- and treatment-related events. Recognizing the complexities of the expectation formation process offers opportunities to develop strategies to enhance patient education and appropriately manage expectations, attend to immediate and long-term concerns, and support patients through the treatment and recovery process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24401875      PMCID: PMC4278194          DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  22 in total

1.  Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience?

Authors:  A J Carr; B Gibson; P G Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

Review 2.  Physiological and functional outcome following ultra-low anterior resection with colon pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Williams; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain?

Authors:  Adena S Scheer; Annette M O'Connor; Beverly P K Chan; Husein Moloo; Eric C Poulin; Joseph Mamazza; Rebecca C Auer; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rectal cancer after combined modality therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and sphincter preservation.

Authors:  D Shibata; J G Guillem; N Lanouette; P Paty; B Minsky; L Harrison; W D Wong; A Cohen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence.

Authors:  A G Thompson; R Suñol
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  Long-term functional results of coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Authors:  P B Paty; W E Enker; A M Cohen; B D Minsky; H Friedlander-Klar
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Expectations and quality of life of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Koller; W Lorenz; K Wagner; A Keil; D Trott; R Engenhart-Cabillic; C Nies
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Katrine J Emmertsen; Søren Laurberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Conceiving the past and future.

Authors:  Ian R Newby-Clark; Michael Ross
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07

10.  Informed consent: how much information is enough?

Authors:  B M Stanley; D J Walters; G J Maddern
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1998-11
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for Locally Advanced T4 Rectal Cancer: Strategies and Techniques.

Authors:  Ramzi M Helewa; Jason Park
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Sexual Function in Women with Colorectal/Anal Cancer.

Authors:  Jocelyn Canty; Cara Stabile; Lisania Milli; Barbara Seidel; Deborah Goldfrank; Jeanne Carter
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2019-01-14

4.  The location of surgical care for rural patients with rectal cancer: patterns of treatment and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Michelle C Nostedt; Andrew M McKay; David J Hochman; Debrah A Wirtzfeld; Clifford S Yaffe; Benson Yip; Richard Silverman; Jason Park
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Discrepancy in the perception of symptoms among patients and healthcare providers after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Hongfan Yu; Wei Dai; Wei Xu; Qingsong Yu; Yang Pu; Yaqin Wang; Jia Liao; Qiang Li; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The Experience of Extended Bowel Resection in Individuals With a High Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Emma J Steel; Alison H Trainer; Alexander G Heriot; Craig Lynch; Susan Parry; Aung K Win; Louise A Keogh
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Postoperative wound infections after a proctectomy--Patient experiences.

Authors:  Karin Hassel; Kristin Andersson; Inga-Lill Koinberg; Berith Wennström
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 8.  Expectations of outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A L Young; E Lee; K Absolom; H Baxter; C Christophi; J P A Lodge; A G Glaser; G J Toogood
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-05-10

9.  The patient perspective on the preoperative colorectal cancer care pathway and preparedness for surgery and postoperative recovery-a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Anne C M Cuijpers; Tim Lubbers; Heleen A van Rens; Valerie Smit-Fun; Christel Gielen; Kim Reynders; Merel L Kimman; Laurents P S Stassen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.885

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.