Literature DB >> 9715150

Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.

F Köckerling1, M A Reymond, C Schneider, C Wittekind, H Scheidbach, J Konradt, L Köhler, E Bärlehner, A Kuthe, H P Bruch, W Hohenberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer is currently under discussion. Results of large, randomized studies will not be available for a number of years yet. This study analyses the results of such resections in consecutive patients operated on by unselected surgeons.
METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was initiated on August 1, 1995, in the German-speaking countries of Europe. One year after initiation of the study, findings are presented with respect to the quality of oncologic resections.
RESULTS: Of 500 operations, 231 (46 percent) were performed for cancer, 167 (33 percent) with a curative intent. The most common curative resections were as follows: 63 anterior rectum resections (38 percent), 51 sigmoid resections (30 percent), and 27 abdominoperineal resections (16 percent). Segmental resections were performed in 20 patients (12 percent). Intraoperative tumor spillage was reported in 2 percent. Mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 11.5-14.6) and positive lymph nodes harvested was 2.2 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 0.9-3.4). Significant differences were noted between participating centers in terms of number of lymph nodes resected (P < 0.0001). Distal and proximal resection margins were tumor-free in every case. Lateral margins were tumor free when examined. In the case of 63 curative anterior resections, the mean distal resection margin was 39 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 33-45) mm, and in 8 of these resections, it was less than 20 min. Mean blood loss was 344 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; 292-396) ml, and 21 percent of patients received blood transfusion.
CONCLUSIONS: These data document that the average quality of laparoscopic colorectal procedures for cancer is satisfactory but differs among surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9715150     DOI: 10.1007/bf02237381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

1.  Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  F Köckerling; H Scheidbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  James S Wu; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an evaluation of the mesorectum's macroscopic quality.

Authors:  S O Breukink; A J K Grond; J P E N Pierie; C Hoff; T Wiggers; W J H J Meijerink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma. Results of a multicenter observational study].

Authors:  H Ptok; R Steinert; F Meyer; K-P Kröll; C Scheele; F Köckerling; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilization.

Authors:  X Bessa; A Castells; A M Lacy; J I Elizalde; S Delgado; L Boix; V Piñol; M Pellisé; J C García-Valdecasas; J M Piqué
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Restorative proctectomy with colon pouch-anal anastomosis by laparoscopic transanal pull-through: an available option for low rectal cancer?

Authors:  F Prete; F P Prete; R De Luca; P Nitti; D Sammarco; G Preziosa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Bretagnol; B Lelong; C Laurent; V Moutardier; A Rullier; G Monges; J-R Delpero; E Rullier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.

Authors:  Ayman Agha; Alois Fürst; Johanna Hierl; Igors Iesalnieks; Gabriel Glockzin; Matthias Anthuber; Karl-Walter Jauch; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.

Authors:  F Feliciotti; M Guerrieri; A M Paganini; A De Sanctis; R Campagnacci; S Perretta; G D'Ambrosio; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.