BACKGROUND:Nitric oxide (NO) may be bronchoprotective in asthma, possibly due to a direct action on airway smooth muscle or through mast cell stabilisation. To investigate this the effects of two doses of nebulised NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a non-selective NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, on exhaled NO levels and airway responsiveness to histamine, a direct smooth muscle spasmogen, and adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP), an indirect spasmogen which activates mast cells, were evaluated in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases each with a double blind, randomised, crossover design. In phase 1, 15 subjects inhaled either L-NAME 54 mg or 0.9% saline 30 minutes before histamine challenge. Nine of these subjects were studied in a similar fashion but were also challenged with AMP. In phase 2, 13 subjects (eight from phase 1) performed thesame protocol but inhaled L-NAME in a dose of 170 mg or 0.9% saline before being challenged with histamine and AMP. RESULTS: The mean (95% CI) reduction in exhaled NO levels after L-NAME 54 mg was 78% (66 to 90) but this did not alter airway responsiveness; the geometric mean (SE) concentration provoking a fall of 20% or more in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) after L-NAME and saline was 0.59 (1.26) and 0.81 (1.26) mg/ml, respectively, for histamine and 20.2 (1.7) and 17.2 (1.6) mg/ml, respectively, for AMP. In contrast, L-NAME 170 mg reduced NO levels to a similar extent (81% (95% CI 76 to 87)) but increased airway responsiveness by approximately one doubling dose to both spasmogens; the geometric mean (SE) PC20 for histamine after L-NAME 170 mg and saline was 0.82 (1.29) and 1.78 (1.19) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001), and for AMP was 11.8 (1.5) and 24.3 (1.4) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that L-NAME increases airway responsiveness in asthma. This may occur through mechanisms separate from NO inhibition or through pathways independent of those responsible for production of NO measured in exhaled air.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Nitric oxide (NO) may be bronchoprotective in asthma, possibly due to a direct action on airway smooth muscle or through mast cell stabilisation. To investigate this the effects of two doses of nebulised NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a non-selective NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, on exhaled NO levels and airway responsiveness to histamine, a direct smooth muscle spasmogen, and adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP), an indirect spasmogen which activates mast cells, were evaluated in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: The study consisted of two phases each with a double blind, randomised, crossover design. In phase 1, 15 subjects inhaled either L-NAME 54 mg or 0.9% saline 30 minutes before histamine challenge. Nine of these subjects were studied in a similar fashion but were also challenged with AMP. In phase 2, 13 subjects (eight from phase 1) performed the same protocol but inhaled L-NAME in a dose of 170 mg or 0.9% saline before being challenged with histamine and AMP. RESULTS: The mean (95% CI) reduction in exhaled NO levels after L-NAME 54 mg was 78% (66 to 90) but this did not alter airway responsiveness; the geometric mean (SE) concentration provoking a fall of 20% or more in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) after L-NAME and saline was 0.59 (1.26) and 0.81 (1.26) mg/ml, respectively, for histamine and 20.2 (1.7) and 17.2 (1.6) mg/ml, respectively, for AMP. In contrast, L-NAME 170 mg reduced NO levels to a similar extent (81% (95% CI 76 to 87)) but increased airway responsiveness by approximately one doubling dose to both spasmogens; the geometric mean (SE) PC20 for histamine after L-NAME 170 mg and saline was 0.82 (1.29) and 1.78 (1.19) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001), and for AMP was 11.8 (1.5) and 24.3 (1.4) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that L-NAME increases airway responsiveness in asthma. This may occur through mechanisms separate from NO inhibition or through pathways independent of those responsible for production of NO measured in exhaled air.
Authors: Q Hamid; D R Springall; V Riveros-Moreno; P Chanez; P Howarth; A Redington; J Bousquet; P Godard; S Holgate; J M Polak Journal: Lancet Date: 1993 Dec 18-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L Kobzik; D S Bredt; C J Lowenstein; J Drazen; B Gaston; D Sugarbaker; J S Stamler Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Herman Meurs; Sue McKay; Harm Maarsingh; Marco A M Hamer; Lejla Macic; Niek Molendijk; Johan Zaagsma Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Nives Zimmermann; Nina E King; Johanne Laporte; Ming Yang; Anil Mishra; Sam M Pope; Emily E Muntel; David P Witte; Anthony A Pegg; Paul S Foster; Qutayba Hamid; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Robert Ten Broeke; Rini De Crom; Rien Van Haperen; Vivienne Verweij; Thea Leusink-Muis; Ingrid Van Ark; Fred De Clerck; Frans P Nijkamp; Gert Folkerts Journal: Respir Res Date: 2006-04-05