Literature DB >> 9712675

Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze.

S Gillner1, H A Mallot.   

Abstract

Spatial behavior in humans and animals includes a wide variety of behavioral competences and makes use of a large number of sensory cues. Here we studied the ability of human subjects to search locations, to find shortcuts and novel paths, to estimate distances between remembered places, and to draw sketch maps of the explored environment; these competences are related to goal-independent memory of space, or cognitive maps. Information on spatial relations was restricted to two types: a visual motion sequence generated by simulated movements in a virtual maze and the subject's own movement decisions defining the path through the maze. Visual information was local (i.e., no global landmarks or compass information was provided). Other position and movement information (vestibular or proprioceptive) was excluded. The amount of visual information provided was varied over four experimental conditions. The results indicate that human subjects are able to learn a virtual maze from sequences of local views and movements. The information acquired is local, consisting of recognized positions and movement decisions associated to them. Although simple associations of this type can be shown to be present in some subjects, more complete configurational knowledge is acquired as well. The results are discussed in a view-based framework of navigation and the representation of spatial knowledge by means of a view graph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9712675     DOI: 10.1162/089892998562861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  37 in total

1.  Of mice and men: virtual Hebb-Williams mazes permit comparison of spatial learning across species.

Authors:  D I Shore; L Stanford; W J MacInnes; R M Klein; R E Brown
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Distance cognition in virtual environmental space: further investigations to clarify the route-angularity effect.

Authors:  Petra Jansen-Osmann; Gunnar Wiedenbauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-08-11

3.  Gaze patterns in navigation: encoding information in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Sahar N Hamid; Brian Stankiewicz; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Sensorimotor representation and knowledge-based reasoning for spatial exploration and localisation.

Authors:  C Zetzsche; J Wolter; K Schill
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-05-07

5.  How does environmental knowledge allow us to come back home?

Authors:  Laura Piccardi; Massimiliano Palmiero; Alessia Bocchi; Maddalena Boccia; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Two spatial memories for honeybee navigation.

Authors:  R Menzel; R Brandt; A Gumbert; B Komischke; J Kunze
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Unitization of route knowledge.

Authors:  Yaakov Hoffman; Amotz Perlman; Ben Orr-Urtreger; Joseph Tzelgov; Emmanuel M Pothos; Darren J Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-27

8.  Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making.

Authors:  Jan M Wiener; Christoph Hölscher; Simon Büchner; Lars Konieczny
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-03

9.  Exploring the Structure of Spatial Representations.

Authors:  Tamas Madl; Stan Franklin; Ke Chen; Robert Trappl; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modelling human visual navigation using multi-view scene reconstruction.

Authors:  Lyndsey C Pickup; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.