Literature DB >> 23778937

Modelling human visual navigation using multi-view scene reconstruction.

Lyndsey C Pickup1, Andrew W Fitzgibbon, Andrew Glennerster.   

Abstract

It is often assumed that humans generate a 3D reconstruction of the environment, either in egocentric or world-based coordinates, but the steps involved are unknown. Here, we propose two reconstruction-based models, evaluated using data from two tasks in immersive virtual reality. We model the observer's prediction of landmark location based on standard photogrammetric methods and then combine location predictions to compute likelihood maps of navigation behaviour. In one model, each scene point is treated independently in the reconstruction; in the other, the pertinent variable is the spatial relationship between pairs of points. Participants viewed a simple environment from one location, were transported (virtually) to another part of the scene and were asked to navigate back. Error distributions varied substantially with changes in scene layout; we compared these directly with the likelihood maps to quantify the success of the models. We also measured error distributions when participants manipulated the location of a landmark to match the preceding interval, providing a direct test of the landmark-location stage of the navigation models. Models such as this, which start with scenes and end with a probabilistic prediction of behaviour, are likely to be increasingly useful for understanding 3D vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778937      PMCID: PMC3755223          DOI: 10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  33 in total

Review 1.  The physiology of stereopsis.

Authors:  B G Cumming; G C DeAngelis
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Route navigating without place recognition: what is recognised in recognition-triggered responses?

Authors:  H A Mallot; S Gillner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 3.  Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner; Denise D J de Grave; Raymond H Cuijpers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Large-scale visual frontoparallels under full-cue conditions.

Authors:  Jan J Koenderink; Andrea J van Doorn; Astrid M L Kappers; Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 5.  Animal cognition: the representation of space, time and number.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis?

Authors:  G Westheimer; S P McKee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Does this computational theory solve the right problem? Marr, Gibson, and the goal of vision.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  View-based navigation in insects: how wood ants (Formica rufa L.) look at and are guided by extended landmarks.

Authors:  Paul Graham; Thomas S Collett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  View-based organization and interplay of spatial working and long-term memories.

Authors:  Wolfgang G Röhrich; Gregor Hardiess; Hanspeter A Mallot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Visual stability-what is the problem?

Authors:  Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Finding Home: Landmark Ambiguity in Human Navigation.

Authors:  Simon Jetzschke; Marc O Ernst; Julia Froehlich; Norbert Boeddeker
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 4.  Taking an insect-inspired approach to bird navigation.

Authors:  David J Pritchard; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.