Literature DB >> 9712572

Carbon dioxide laser ablation with immediate autografting in a full-thickness porcine burn model.

R D Glatter1, J S Goldberg, K T Schomacker, C C Compton, T J Flotte, D P Bua, K W Greaves, N S Nishioka, R L Sheridan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term clinical and histologic outcome of immediate autografting of full-thickness burn wounds ablated with a high-power continuous-wave CO2 laser to sharply débrided wounds in a porcine model. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Continuous-wave CO2 lasers have performed poorly as tools for burn excision because the large amount of thermal damage to viable subeschar tissues precluded successful autografting. However, a new technique, in which a high-power laser is rapidly scanned over the eschar, results in eschar vaporization without significant damage to underlying viable tissues, allowing successful immediate autografting.
METHODS: Full-thickness paravertebral burn wounds measuring 36 cm2 were created on 11 farm swine. Wounds were ablated to adipose tissue 48 hours later using either a surgical blade or a 150-Watt continuous-wave CO2 laser deflected by an x-y galvanometric scanner that translated the beam over the tissue surface, removing 200 microm of tissue per scan. Both sites were immediately autografted and serially evaluated clinically and histologically for 180 days.
RESULTS: The laser-treated sites were nearly bloodless. The mean residual thermal damage was 0.18+/-0.05 mm. The mean graft take was 96+/-11% in manual sites and 93+/-8% in laser sites. On postoperative day 7, the thickness of granulation tissue at the graft-wound bed interface was greater in laser-debrided sites. By postoperative day 180, the manual and laser sites were histologically identical. Vancouver scar assessment revealed no differences in scarring at postoperative day 180.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term scarring, based on Vancouver scar assessments and histologic evaluation, was equivalent at 6 months in laser-ablated and sharply excised sites. Should this technology become practical, the potential clinical implications include a reduction in surgical blood loss without sacrifice of immediate engraftment rates or long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9712572      PMCID: PMC1191468          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199808000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  39 in total

1.  THE SKIN OF THE DOMESTIC PIG.

Authors:  W MONTAGNA; J S YUN
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 2.  Management of burn wounds with prompt excision and immediate closure.

Authors:  R L Sheridan; R G Tompkins; J F Burke
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.510

3.  Middermal wound healing. A comparison between dermatomal excision and pulsed carbon dioxide laser ablation.

Authors:  H A Green; E Burd; N S Nishioka; U Brüggemann; C C Compton
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1992-05

4.  Comparative study of wound healing in porcine skin with CO2 laser and other surgical modalities: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Y M Molgat; S V Pollack; J J Hurwitz; S J Bunas; T Manning; K M McCormack; S R Pinnell
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.736

5.  Blood transfusions: for the thermally injured or for the doctor?

Authors:  K M Sittig; E A Deitch
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1994-03

6.  The effect of topical epinephrine on blood loss following tangential excision of burn wounds.

Authors:  A H Roberts
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Surgical lasers and soft tissue interactions.

Authors:  T M Gillis; M S Strong
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Histology of port-wine stain treated with carbon dioxide laser. A preliminary report.

Authors:  J W Buecker; J L Ratz; D F Richfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Safety of the blood supply. Surrogate testing and transmission of hepatitis C in patients after massive transfusion.

Authors:  J A Morris; T R Wilcox; G W Reed; E B Hunter; C H Wallas; E A Steane; S D Shotts; J L Vitsky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Changes in transfusion practices in burn patients.

Authors:  R Mann; D M Heimbach; L H Engrav; H Foy
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1994-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  A haemostatic technique using silicone gel dressing for burn surgery.

Authors:  Akinori Osuka; Yuichi Kuroki; Masashi Ueyama
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Comparing the reported burn conditions for different severity burns in porcine models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine J Andrews; Leila Cuttle
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Experimental full-thickness burns induced by CO2 laser.

Authors:  Milene da Silva Melo; Leandro Procópio Alves; Ricardo Scarparo Navarro; Carlos José de Lima; Egberto Munin; Maria das Graças Vilela-Goulart; Mônica Fernandes Gomes; Miguel Angel Castillo Salgado; Renato Amaro Zângaro
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Burn Wound Healing and Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Adam J Singer; Steven T Boyce
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Wound healing of cutaneous sulfur mustard injuries: strategies for the development of improved therapies.

Authors:  John S Graham; Robert P Chilcott; Paul Rice; Stephen M Milner; Charles G Hurst; Beverly I Maliner
Journal:  J Burns Wounds       Date:  2005-01-05

6.  [Factor XIII-guided treatment algorithm reduces blood transfusion in burn surgery].

Authors:  João Miguel Gonçalves Valadares de Morais Carneiro; Joana Alves; Patrícia Conde; Fátima Xambre; Emanuel Almeida; Céline Marques; Mariana Luís; Ana Maria Mano Garção Godinho; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.