Literature DB >> 9712131

Improvements in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: effects of device, communication mode, and chronological age.

T A Meyer1, M A Svirsky, K I Kirk, R T Miyamoto.   

Abstract

The present investigation expanded on an earlier study by Miyamoto, Osberger, Todd, Robbins, Karasek, et al. (1994) who compared the speech perception skills of two groups of children with profound prelingual hearing loss. The first group had received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and was tested longitudinally. The second group, who were not implanted and used conventional hearing aids, was tested at a single point in time. In the present study, speech perception scores were examined over time for both groups of children as a function of communication mode of the child. Separate linear regressions of speech perception scores as a function of age were computed to estimate the rate of improvement in speech perception abilities that might be expected due to maturation for the hearing aid users (n=58) within each communication mode. The resulting regression lines were used to compare the estimated rate of speech perception growth for each hearing aid group to the observed gains in speech perception made by the children with multichannel cochlear implants. A large number of children using cochlear implants (n=74) were tested over a long period of implant use (m=3.5 years) that ranged from zero to 8.5 years. In general, speech perception scores for the children using cochlear implants were higher than those predicted for a group of children with 101-110 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids, and they approached the scores predicted for a group of children with 90-100 dB HL of hearing loss using hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9712131     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4104.846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  9 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Early listening and speaking skills predict later reading proficiency in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Linda J Spencer; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cochlear implants in children.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; W H Shapiro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-12

4.  A Prospective Longitudinal Study of U.S. Children Unable to Achieve Open-Set Speech Recognition 5 Years After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Jennifer M Barnard; Laurel M Fisher; Karen C Johnson; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Christine M Carson; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  A novel mutation of TMPRSS3 related to milder auditory phenotype in Korean postlingual deafness: a possible future implication for a personalized auditory rehabilitation.

Authors:  Juyong Chung; Sang Min Park; Sun O Chang; Taesu Chung; Kyoung Yeul Lee; Ah Reum Kim; Joo Hyun Park; Veronica Kim; Woong-Yang Park; Seung-Ha Oh; Dongsup Kim; Woo Jin Park; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Information theoretic evaluation of a noiseband-based cochlear implant simulator.

Authors:  Daniel E Aguiar; N Ellen Taylor; Jing Li; Daniel K Gazanfari; Thomas M Talavage; J Brandon Laflen; Heidi Neuberger; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Pediatric cochlear implantation-I : Candidacy.

Authors:  Kevin H Franck; Anupam Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-04

8.  Early Postimplant Speech Perception and Language Skills Predict Long-Term Language and Neurocognitive Outcomes Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; William G Kronenberger; Irina Castellanos; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Children using cochlear implants capitalize on acoustical hearing for music perception.

Authors:  Talar Hopyan; Isabelle Peretz; Lisa P Chan; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.