Literature DB >> 9710551

On Learning To Become a Successful Loser: A Comparison of Alternative Abstractions of Learning Processes in the Loss Domain.

.   

Abstract

One of the main difficulties in the development of descriptive models of learning in repeated choice tasks involves the abstraction of the effect of losses. The present paper explains this difficulty, summarizes its common solutions, and presents an experiment that was designed to compare the descriptive power of the specific quantifications of these solutions proposed in recent research. The experiment utilized a probability learning task. In each of the experiment's 500 trials participants were asked to predict the appearance of one of two colors. The probabilities of appearance of the colors were different but fixed during the entire experiment. The experimental manipulation involved an addition of a constant to the payoffs. The results demonstrate that learning in the loss domain can be faster than learning in the gain domain; adding a constant to the payoff matrix can affect the learning process. These results are consistent with Erev & Roth's (1996) adjustable reference point abstraction of the effect of losses, and violate all other models. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9710551     DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  8 in total

1.  Recombination and the evolution of coordinated phenotypic expression in a frequency-dependent game.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs.

Authors:  Tim Rakow; Katherine Miler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

3.  Evolution of social learning when high expected payoffs are associated with high risk of failure.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Optimizing vs. matching: response strategy in a probabilistic learning task is associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Zuzana Kasanova; James A Waltz; Gregory P Strauss; Michael J Frank; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Co-evolution of learning complexity and social foraging strategies.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  To Take Risk is to Face Loss: A Tonic Pupillometry Study.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Ariel Telpaz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-22

7.  Exploration and recency as the main proximate causes of probability matching: a reinforcement learning analysis.

Authors:  Carolina Feher da Silva; Camila Gomes Victorino; Nestor Caticha; Marcus Vinícius Chrysóstomo Baldo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Contrasting temporal difference and opportunity cost reinforcement learning in an empirical money-emergence paradigm.

Authors:  Germain Lefebvre; Aurélien Nioche; Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde; Stefano Palminteri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.