Literature DB >> 9710549

Information, Strategic Behavior, and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study.

.   

Abstract

This paper reports on an experimental study of ultimatum bargaining situations in which an inactive third player is present. The proposer X suggests an allocation (x, y, z) on how to divide a cake between X, Y, and Z. A message m that (partially) reveals this proposal is sent to the responder Y who has to accept or reject it. If Y accepts, each player gets paid as proposed, otherwise each player receives zero. In our experiments the three messages m=(x, y, z), m=y, and m=z were used. The information condition is common knowledge. The proposer's offer is seen to depend on the information condition. Specifically, the lower the information content of the message, the greedier the demand x of the proposer. In the case where m z, the modal proposal allocates (almost) all of the cake to X. In the other cases, the responder receives slightly more than 1/3 of the cake on average. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Year:  1998        PMID: 9710549     DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  11 in total

1.  Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.

Authors:  Johanna Alexopoulos; Daniela M Pfabigan; Claus Lamm; Herbert Bauer; Florian Ph S Fischmeister
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Virtual bargaining: a theory of social decision-making.

Authors:  Jennifer B Misyak; Nick Chater
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A New Solution Concept for the Ultimatum Game leading to the Golden Ratio.

Authors:  Stefan Schuster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation.

Authors:  Jutta Peterburs; Rolf Voegler; Roman Liepelt; Anna Schulze; Saskia Wilhelm; Sebastian Ocklenburg; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Misato Inaba; Yumi Inoue; Satoshi Akutsu; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Toshio Yamagishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Golden Gait: An Optimization Theory Perspective on Human and Humanoid Walking.

Authors:  Marco Iosa; Giovanni Morone; Stefano Paolucci
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.

Authors:  Ciril Bosch-Rosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.

Authors:  Julie Novakova; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.

Authors:  Johanna Alexopoulos; Daniela M Pfabigan; Florian Göschl; Herbert Bauer; Florian Ph S Fischmeister
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Music-induced Mood Biases Decision Strategies during the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Hwanjun Chung; Eun Jung Lee; You Jin Jung; Sang Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.