Literature DB >> 9709276

The Gothenburg Breast Cancer Screening Trial: preliminary results on breast cancer mortality for women aged 39-49.

N Bjurstam1, L Björneld, S W Duffy, T C Smith, E Cahlin, O Erikson, H Lingaas, J Mattsson, S Persson, C M Rudenstam, J Säwe-Söderberg.   

Abstract

We carried out a randomized trial of invitation to screening mammography in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden, to estimate the effect of screening on breast cancer mortality in women under age 50 years. A total of 11,724 women aged 39-49 were randomized to the study group, which was invited to mammographic screening every 18 months; 14,217 women in the same age range were randomized to a control group, which was not invited to screening until the fifth screen of the study group. Breast cancers diagnosed in both groups between randomization and immediately after the first screen of the control group were followed up for death from breast cancer to the end of December 1994. There was a significant 44% reduction in mortality from breast cancer in the study group compared to the control group (relative risk [RR] = 0.56, P = 0.042, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.98). A conservative estimate based on removal of the cancers detected at the first screen of the control group gave an RR = 0.59 (P = 0.069, 95% CI: 0.33-1.05). The true answer is likely to lie between the two estimates. These data suggest that mammographic screening can reduce breast cancer mortality in women under age 50, particularly if high-quality mammography is used and a short interscreening interval is adhered to.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9709276     DOI: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  9 in total

1.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Evaluating a tailored intervention to increase screening mammography in an urban area.

Authors:  Bruce Allen; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Ayse Nilufer Ozaydın; Erkin Aribal; Beyza Ozcinar; Neslihan Cabioglu; Cennet Sahin; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01

Review 6.  Nutritional screening for improving professional practice for patient outcomes in hospital and primary care settings.

Authors:  Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Yasaman Vali; Susan M Murray; David Wonderling; Arash Rashidian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-06

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

8.  At what age should screening mammography be recommended for Asian women?

Authors:  Junko Tsuchida; Masayuki Nagahashi; Omar M Rashid; Kazuaki Takabe; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Interpretation of breast cancer screening guideline for Chinese women.

Authors:  Yubei Huang; Zhongsheng Tong; Kexin Chen; Ying Wang; Peifang Liu; Lin Gu; Juntian Liu; Jinpu Yu; Fengju Song; Wenhua Zhao; Yehui Shi; Hui Li; Huaiyuan Xiao; Xishan Hao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.248

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.