OBJECTIVE: There is extensive evidence for post-lesional plasticity in the language and motor domains. We examined possible domain-specific differences in reorganizational patterns, hypothesizing that interhemispheric reorganization would be predominantly homotopic for language, but predominantly nonhomotopic for motor control. DESIGN: Using oxygen 15-water positron emission tomography, regional cerebral blood flow was studied during rest, listening to sentences, repetition of sentences, and finger tapping of the right hand. Task-specific primary, secondary, and tertiary regions of interest were defined according to the degree of regional involvement in language/motor functions as documented in previous studies. Regional activations were compared within and across functional domains. PATIENTS: Nine patients (aged 4-20 years) with unilateral left hemisphere lesion involving both the primary motor and perisylvian language cortices were studied. Two samples of healthy adults were included for additional comparisons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hemispheric asymmetry of blood flow changes within regions of interest. RESULTS: As predicted, rightward asymmetry of activations in primary and secondary regions was stronger for language than for movement, but the expected inverse difference for tertiary regions (greater rightward asymmetry of motor activations) was not found. Within-domain comparisons showed that for listening to sentences, rightward asymmetry was strongest in primary and weakest in tertiary regions, whereas the inverse differences were found for movement. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a greater potential for homotopic interhemispheric reorganization in the language than in the motor domain. Interhemispheric motor reorganization was generally limited.
OBJECTIVE: There is extensive evidence for post-lesional plasticity in the language and motor domains. We examined possible domain-specific differences in reorganizational patterns, hypothesizing that interhemispheric reorganization would be predominantly homotopic for language, but predominantly nonhomotopic for motor control. DESIGN: Using oxygen 15-water positron emission tomography, regional cerebral blood flow was studied during rest, listening to sentences, repetition of sentences, and finger tapping of the right hand. Task-specific primary, secondary, and tertiary regions of interest were defined according to the degree of regional involvement in language/motor functions as documented in previous studies. Regional activations were compared within and across functional domains. PATIENTS: Nine patients (aged 4-20 years) with unilateral left hemisphere lesion involving both the primary motor and perisylvian language cortices were studied. Two samples of healthy adults were included for additional comparisons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hemispheric asymmetry of blood flow changes within regions of interest. RESULTS: As predicted, rightward asymmetry of activations in primary and secondary regions was stronger for language than for movement, but the expected inverse difference for tertiary regions (greater rightward asymmetry of motor activations) was not found. Within-domain comparisons showed that for listening to sentences, rightward asymmetry was strongest in primary and weakest in tertiary regions, whereas the inverse differences were found for movement. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a greater potential for homotopic interhemispheric reorganization in the language than in the motor domain. Interhemispheric motor reorganization was generally limited.
Authors: Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Scott K Holland; Weihong Yuan; Mekibib Altaye; Blaise V Jones; Linda J Michaud; Nicolay Chertkoff Walz; Shari L Wade Journal: NeuroRehabilitation Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.138
Authors: Biba R Stanton; V C Williams; P N Leigh; Steven C R Williams; C R V Blain; J M Jarosz; Andrew Simmons Journal: J Neurol Date: 2007-03-25 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Jerzy P Szaflarski; Kenneth Eaton; Angel L Ball; Christi Banks; Jennifer Vannest; Jane B Allendorfer; Stephen Page; Scott K Holland Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld; C Tempelmann; C Gaul; G R Kühnel; E Düzel; J-M Hopf; H Feistner; S Zierz; H-J Heinze; S Vielhaber Journal: J Neurol Date: 2005-03-06 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Scott K Holland; Jennifer Vannest; Marc Mecoli; Lisa M Jacola; Jan-Mendelt Tillema; Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Vincent J Schmithorst; Weihong Yuan; Elena Plante; Anna W Byars Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: L M Jacola; M B Schapiro; V J Schmithorst; A W Byars; R H Strawsburg; J P Szaflarski; E Plante; S K Holland Journal: Neuropediatrics Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 1.947
Authors: Damien A Fair; Alexander H Choi; Yannic B L Dosenbach; Rebecca S Coalson; Francis M Miezin; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 2.381