Literature DB >> 9708461

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

H V Barron1, A D Michaels, C Maynard, N R Every.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor prescribing patterns.
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated a significant mortality benefit in patients treated with ACE inhibitors after AMI. Numerous studies have demonstrated underuse of other beneficial treatments for patients with AMI, such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents, aspirin and immediate reperfusion therapy.
METHODS: Demographic, procedural and discharge medication data from 190,015 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 U.S. hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.
RESULTS: Prescriptions for ACE inhibitor therapy at hospital discharge increased from 25.0% in 1994 to 30.7% in 1996. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40% or evidence of congestive heart failure while in the hospital were discharged with ACE inhibitor treatment 42.6% of the time. Of patients experiencing an anterior wall myocardial infarction and no evidence of heart failure, 26.1% of patients were discharged with this treatment. Of the remaining patients, 15.6% received ACE inhibitors at discharge. ACE inhibitors were prescribed more often to elderly and diabetic patients as well as those requiring intraaortic balloon pump placement. This therapy was given less often to patients who underwent revascularization with coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery or were treated with calcium channel blocking agents.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction with increasing frequency. Those patients with the greatest expected benefit receive ACE inhibitor treatment most often. However, the majority of even these high risk patients were not discharged with this life-saving therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9708461     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00225-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Acute myocardial infarction in Canada: improvement with time.

Authors:  A Dodek
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-07-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Use of secondary preventive drugs in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated medically or with coronary angioplasty: results from the nationwide French PREVENIR survey.

Authors:  N Danchin; O Grenier; J Ferrières; C Cantet; J-P Cambou
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Secondary prevention for coronary artery disease: are we following the guidelines?

Authors:  I A A Syed; A Riaz; A Ryan; M O Reilly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Survival of patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction and evidence-based drug therapy.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Gouya; Berthold Reichardt; Gerald Ohrenberger; Michael Wolzt
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Impact of diabetes on hospital adverse cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: Data from the Saudi project of acute coronary events.

Authors:  Khalid A Alnemer; Hussam F Alfaleh; Khalid F Alhabib; Anhar Ullah; Ahmad Hersi; Shukri Alsaif; Amir Taraben; Gamal Hussein; Modather Butt
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-08-27

Review 6.  Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and heart failure. The consequences of underprescribing.

Authors:  F Andersson; C Cline; T Rydén-Bergsten; L Erhardt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Changes in the treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Quebec, 1988-1995.

Authors:  L Pilote; F Lavoie; V Ho; M J Eisenberg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-07-11       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Changing trends in the evaluation of ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: the Worcester Heart Attack Study.

Authors:  Paul A Santolucito; Dennis A Tighe; Darleen Lessard; Rovshan M Ismailov; Joel M Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Dennis T Ko; David A Alter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Factors associated with the use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Dennis T Ko; David A Alter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.