Literature DB >> 9707566

In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones.

J Chatellier1, F Hill, P A Lund, A R Fersht.   

Abstract

Fragments encompassing the apical domain of GroEL, called minichaperones, facilitate the refolding of several proteins in vitro without requiring GroES, ATP, or the cage-like structure of multimeric GroEL. We have identified the smallest minichaperone that is active in vitro in chaperoning the refolding of rhodanese and cyclophilin A: GroEL(193-335). This finding raises the question of whether the minichaperones are active under more stringent conditions in vivo. The smallest minichaperones complement two temperature-sensitive Escherichia coli groEL alleles, EL44 and EL673, at 43 degreesC. Although they cannot replace GroEL in cells in which the chromosomal groEL gene has been deleted by P1 transduction, GroEL(193-335) enhances the colony-forming ability of such cells when limiting amounts of GroEL are expressed from a tightly regulated plasmid. Surprisingly, we found that overexpression of GroEL prevents plaque formation by bacteriophage lambda and inhibits replication of the lambda origin-dependent plasmid, Lorist6. The minichaperones also inhibit Lorist6 replication, but less markedly. The complex quaternary structure of GroEL, its central cavity, and the structural allosteric changes that take place on the binding of nucleotides and GroES are not essential for all of its functions in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9707566      PMCID: PMC21427          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

Review 1.  The universally conserved GroE (Hsp60) chaperonins.

Authors:  J Zeilstra-Ryalls; O Fayet; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Braig; P D Adams; A T Brünger
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1995-12

3.  Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter.

Authors:  L M Guzman; D Belin; M J Carson; J Beckwith
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Chaperonin-assisted protein folding of the enzyme rhodanese by GroEL/GroES.

Authors:  P M Horowitz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1995

5.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms.

Authors:  J S Weissman; Y Kashi; W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-08-26       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A.

Authors:  K Braig; Z Otwinowski; R Hegde; D C Boisvert; A Joachimiak; A L Horwich; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release.

Authors:  W A Fenton; Y Kashi; K Furtak; A L Horwich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Two classes of extragenic suppressor mutations identify functionally distinct regions of the GroEL chaperone of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Zeilstra-Ryalls; O Fayet; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Sequence analysis and phenotypic characterization of groEL mutations that block lambda and T4 bacteriophage growth.

Authors:  J Zeilstra-Ryalls; O Fayet; L Baird; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding.

Authors:  M J Todd; P V Viitanen; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

1.  Single amino acid substitutions on the surface of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein can have a profound impact on the solubility of fusion proteins.

Authors:  J D Fox; R B Kapust; D S Waugh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  The substrate binding domain of DnaK facilitates slow protein refolding.

Authors:  Naoki Tanaka; Shota Nakao; Hiromasa Wadai; Shoichi Ikeda; Jean Chatellier; Shigeru Kunugi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reply to Marchenko et al.: Flux analysis of GroEL-assisted protein folding/unfolding.

Authors:  David S Libich; Vitali Tugarinov; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity.

Authors:  J D Wang; M D Michelitsch; J S Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  A P Ben-Zvi; J Chatellier; A R Fersht; P Goloubinoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Intrinsic unfoldase/foldase activity of the chaperonin GroEL directly demonstrated using multinuclear relaxation-based NMR.

Authors:  David S Libich; Vitali Tugarinov; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Design of highly stable functional GroEL minichaperones.

Authors:  Q Wang; A M Buckle; N W Foster; C M Johnson; A R Fersht
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  The versatile mutational "repertoire" of Escherichia coli GroEL, a multidomain chaperonin nanomachine.

Authors:  Tomohiro Mizobata; Yasushi Kawata
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-11-27

9.  Bacterial and yeast chaperones reduce both aggregate formation and cell death in mammalian cell models of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  J Carmichael; J Chatellier; A Woolfson; C Milstein; A R Fersht; D C Rubinsztein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Mini-chaperones: potential immuno-stimulators in vaccine design.

Authors:  Azam Bolhassani; Sima Rafati
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.