Literature DB >> 9704794

Obstetric ultrasonography: a biophysical consideration of patient safety--the "rules" have changed.

M W Miller1, A A Brayman, J S Abramowicz.   

Abstract

We address the issue of health and safety in relation to exposure to diagnostic ultrasound, with particular emphasis given to obstetrics. In terms of fetal and maternal outcomes, the epidemiologic record of diagnostic ultrasound is exemplary but is primarily made on the basis of data derived from clinical devices whose outputs were relatively low compared with what is now allowable and available. The power outputs of clinical devices have been increasing over the past decade such that the potential for thermal and nonthermal insults is increased. For obstetric devices that use these higher outputs, the Food and Drug Administration now requires the presentation of 2 on-screen indexes, the thermal index and the mechanical index, in recognition of the 2 major mechanisms by which ultrasonography is known to affect cells and tissues. Greater responsibility for patient safety is now placed on the diagnostician; for the new indexes to be meaningful the diagnostician must be cognizant of the health and safety implications. The purpose of this article is to provide some guidance to the obstetrician in interpreting the indexes and to review the current status of ultrasonography biophysics in relation to the use of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9704794     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70279-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Prenatal ultrasound heating impacts on fluctuations in haematological analysis of Oryctolagus cuniculus.

Authors:  Farah Wahida Ahmad Zaiki; Sulaiman Md Dom; Hairil Rashmizal Abdul Razak; Hamzah Fansuri Hassan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2013-10

2.  Are prenatal ultrasound scans associated with the autism phenotype? Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yonit K Stoch; Cori J Williams; Joanna Granich; Anna M Hunt; Lou I Landau; John P Newnham; Andrew J O Whitehouse
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-12

3.  Above genetics: lessons from cerebral development in autism.

Authors:  Emily L Williams; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 1.757

4.  Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Roy A Filly; Joshua A Copel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Automated Techniques for the Interpretation of Fetal Abnormalities: A Review.

Authors:  Vidhi Rawat; Alok Jain; Vibhakar Shrimali
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Prenatal ultrasound exposure and association with postnatal hearing outcomes.

Authors:  Claude F Harbarger; Paul M Weinberger; Jack C Borders; Charles A Hughes
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-01-31

7.  Study of the association between the incidences of congenital anomalies and hydrocephalus in Sudanese fetuses.

Authors:  Mustafa Z Mahmoud; Hussien A Dinar; Alsafi A Abdulla; Esameldeen Babikir; Abdelmoneim Sulieman
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-04-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.