Literature DB >> 9703619

A questionnaire survey on nematode control practices on horse farms in Denmark and the existence of risk factors for the development of anthelmintic resistance.

S Lendal1, M M Larsen, H Bjørn, J Craven, M Chriél, S N Olsen.   

Abstract

A questionnaire survey to obtain information on endoparasite control practices and management on 68 Danish horse farms was undertaken in 1995. The study revealed that foals, young horses and adults were on average, annually treated 4.3, 4.0 and 3.7 times, respectively. The most commonly used drug from 1993-1995 was ivermectin. On average 2.4 different drugs were used annually. The most used method of weight estimation was eye measure: for foals by 78%, for youngsters by 81% and adults by 82% of the herd owners. The most commonly used weight in the dosing of anthelmintics was individual weights of the horse: 72% of the herd owners dosed their foals this way. 76% their youngsters and 75% their adults. Sixty two percent of the herd owners treated at turn out, 47% at housing, 57% treated when buying new horses, 26% treated when stabling visiting horses, 78% applied pasture change and 18% performed alternate/mixed grazing. Sixty one percent of the herds had experienced problems with diarrhoea and in 18% of the cases the suspected cause was considered to be endoparasites. 33% of the farms performed disease registration and on 25% Faecal Egg Count Reduction tests had been performed before entering this study. The herd owners obtained their formation about endoparasite control from veterinarians, meetings and papers in that order of importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9703619     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00117-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  7 in total

1.  A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management.

Authors:  Barbara Hinney; Nicole Catherine Wirtherle; Moses Kyule; Norbert Miethe; Karl-Hans Zessin; Peter-Henning Clausen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences.

Authors:  Martin K Nielsen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Equine cyathostomins: a review of biology, clinical significance and therapy.

Authors:  Susan Corning
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics.

Authors:  G Sallé; J Cortet; I Bois; C Dubès; Q Guyot-Sionest; C Larrieu; V Landrin; G Majorel; S Wittreck; E Woringer; A Couroucé; J Guillot; P Jacquiet; F Guégnard; A Blanchard; A Leblond
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Effects of worm control practices examined by a combined faecal egg count and questionnaire survey on horse farms in Germany, Italy and the UK.

Authors:  Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Donato Traversa; Janina Demeler; Karl Rohn; Piermarino Milillo; Sandra Schurmann; Riccardo Lia; Stefania Perrucci; Antonio Frangipane di Regalbono; Paola Beraldo; Helen Barnes; Rami Cobb; Albert Boeckh
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Risk factors for high endoparasitic burden and the efficiency of a single anthelmintic treatment of Danish horses.

Authors:  M M Larsen; S Lendal; M Chriél; S N Olsen; H Bjørn
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms.

Authors:  Eva Osterman Lind; Erik Rautalinko; Arvid Uggla; Peter J Waller; David A Morrison; Johan Höglund
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 1.695

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.