Literature DB >> 21559764

A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management.

Barbara Hinney1, Nicole Catherine Wirtherle, Moses Kyule, Norbert Miethe, Karl-Hans Zessin, Peter-Henning Clausen.   

Abstract

Control strategies for horse helminths are controversially discussed, and no ideal strategy exists. Presently, the spreading of anthelmintic resistance against all three classes of anthelmintics is of special concern. Advice on how to slow the development of anthelmintic resistance does not seem to have reached the majority of horse owners yet. In our study, we wanted to capture the current standard of helminth control and to analyse the effectiveness of these control strategies. Seven hundred horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany were sent a questionnaire in June/July 2006 asking various questions on farm structure and practices of helminth control. Two hundred thirty-five farms (33.6%) with 6,007 horses in total returned the questionnaire. The number of horses held on each farm varied from 1 to 320. From those returned questionnaires, a random sample of 126 horse farms and 1,407 horses was selected for faecal examination from August to December 2006. The questionnaire results from these farms were correlated with results from the faecal examination to perform risk analysis via multivariate regression. For each farm, results from faecal examination were summarized in index values. Risk was defined as an over-average level of strongyle egg shedding. Risk factors as established by multivariate regression analyses were integrated into three models. Rare deworming and infrequent cleaning of stables were identified as significant risk factors throughout all three models. Additional risk factors could be identified with respect to individual models: elevated percentage of young horses on a farm, not using macrocyclic lactones in the deworming process and dosing anthelmintics on the basis of weight and height. Pasture hygiene did not lead to significant risk reduction, indicating that such measures are inadequately performed on many farms. The questionnaire on its own gave us an insight into control strategies throughout a representative scope of farms in Brandenburg, Germany: faeces were collected from pasture on 22% of horse farms, 79% cleaned out the stables daily. A number of other measures were employed. With respect to anthelmintic use, 21% of the farms stated to use results from faecal examination as a criterion for deworming. We could also identify the most common deworming frequencies, with adult horses being dewormed two times a year (46% of farms) and foals being dewormed four times a year (35% of farms). The frequency ranged from 1 to 7 and 2 to 12 times, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21559764     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2434-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  28 in total

1.  Management of drug-resistant cyathostominosis on a breeding farm in central North Carolina.

Authors:  D Little; J R Flowers; B H Hammerberg; S Y Gardner
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles.

Authors:  J L Duncan; S Love
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Prescription-only anthelmintics--a questionnaire survey of strategies for surveillance and control of equine strongyles in Denmark.

Authors:  M K Nielsen; J Monrad; S N Olsen
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 4.  Slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistant nematodes of horses in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R P Herd; G C Coles
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1995-05-13       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 5.  [Frequent deworming in horses; it usually does not do any good, but it often harms].

Authors:  M Eysker; D C K van Doorn; S N Lems; A Weteling; H W Ploeger
Journal:  Tijdschr Diergeneeskd       Date:  2006 Jul 15-Aug 1

Review 6.  Epidemiology and control of parasites in northern temperate regions.

Authors:  R P Herd
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.792

7.  A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland.

Authors:  Bryan O'Meara; Grace Mulcahy
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes.

Authors:  S Lloyd; J Smith; R M Connan; M A Hatcher; T R Hedges; D J Humphrey; A C Jones
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Control of strongylosis in horses by alternate grazing of horses and sheep and some other aspects of the epidemiology of Strongylidae infections.

Authors:  M Eysker; J Jansen; M H Mirck
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms.

Authors:  Eva Osterman Lind; Erik Rautalinko; Arvid Uggla; Peter J Waller; David A Morrison; Johan Höglund
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 1.695

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prevalence, intensity and seasonality of gastrointestinal parasites in abattoir horses in Germany.

Authors:  Steffen Rehbein; Martin Visser; Renate Winter
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Efficacy of selected anthelmintic drugs against cyathostomins in horses in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany.

Authors:  Juliane K Fischer; Barbara Hinney; Matthew J Denwood; Donato Traversa; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Peter-Henning Clausen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change.

Authors:  Guillaume Sallé; Jacques Cabaret
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2015-09-14

4.  Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment.

Authors:  Stephanie Schneider; Kurt Pfister; Anne M Becher; Miriam C Scheuerle
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture - method comparison and occurrence assessment.

Authors:  A Kaspar; K Pfister; M K Nielsen; C Silaghi; H Fink; M C Scheuerle
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Risk factor analysis of equine strongyle resistance to anthelmintics.

Authors:  G Sallé; J Cortet; I Bois; C Dubès; Q Guyot-Sionest; C Larrieu; V Landrin; G Majorel; S Wittreck; E Woringer; A Couroucé; J Guillot; P Jacquiet; F Guégnard; A Blanchard; A Leblond
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Anthelmintic Resistance of Strongyle Nematodes to Ivermectin and Fenbendazole on Cart Horses in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zewdu Seyoum; Alemu Zewdu; Shimelis Dagnachew; Basazinew Bogale
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Parasite Occurrence and Parasite Management in Swedish Horses Presenting with Gastrointestinal Disease-A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ylva Hedberg-Alm; Johanna Penell; Miia Riihimäki; Eva Osterman-Lind; Martin K Nielsen; Eva Tydén
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys.

Authors:  Christopher J Corbett; Sandy Love; Anna Moore; Faith A Burden; Jacqui B Matthews; Matthew J Denwood
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.876

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.