Literature DB >> 9703348

Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions.

A Aarås1, G Horgen, H H Bjørset, O Ro, M Thoresen.   

Abstract

The study has a parallel group design with two intervention groups (T and S) and one control group (C) of VDU operators. Three serial interventions were carried out in the T and S groups, first a new lighting system, then new workplaces and last an optometric examination and corrections if needed. The new lighting gave significantly increased illuminance levels, increased luminances of the room surfaces and better luminance distribution. The two intervention groups reported significant improvement of the lighting conditions, as well as of the visual conditions and significantly reduced visual discomfort and glare. Significant reduction of headache was found in one of the intervention groups. Optometric corrections reduced the visual discomfort in both the intervention groups. When looking at those given new corrections, a significant reduction was found in the T group and a clear tendency was also found in the S group. The C group reported no improvements for any of these health outcomes. The workplace intervention gave the operator the possibility to support the whole forearm and hand on the table top. Before the intervention there were no significant differences between the three groups regarding shoulder pain and static trapezius electromyographic (EMG) load. Two years after the intervention, a significant reduction of shoulder pain was reported in the T and S groups in parallel with a significant reduction in static trapezius load, while no such reduction was found in the C group. At the same time, both static trapezius load and shoulder pain were significantly lower in the T and S groups compared with the C group. Pain in the forearm and hand showed no significant changes in any of the groups during the study period. However, there seem to be a relationship between pain in the forearm and hand and the time the operator used the mouse. The C group reported significantly higher intensity of pain and used the mouse significantly more than the S group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9703348     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00079-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  26 in total

1.  Working conditions, visual fatigue, and mental health among systems analysts in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  L E Rocha; M Debert-Ribeiro
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units.

Authors:  T Korhonen; R Ketola; R Toivonen; R Luukkonen; M Häkkänen; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A replicated field intervention study evaluating the impact of a highly adjustable chair and office ergonomics training on visual symptoms.

Authors:  Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; Benjamin C Amick; Michelle Robertson; Lianna Bazzani; Kelly DeRango; Ted Rooney; Anne Moore
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  A field intervention examining the impact of an office ergonomics training and a highly adjustable chair on visual symptoms in a public sector organization.

Authors:  Benjamin C Amick; Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; Lianna Bazzani; Michelle Robertson; Kelly DeRango; Ted Rooney; Anne Moore
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Comparative assessment of study groups of elderly female computer users from four European countries: questionnaires used in the NEW study.

Authors:  L Sandsjö; P Larsman; M M R Vollenbroek-Hutten; T Läubli; B Juul-Kristensen; A Klipstein; H Hermens; K Søgaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Neuromuscular assessment in elderly workers with and without work related shoulder/neck trouble: the NEW-study design and physiological findings.

Authors:  G Sjøgaard; K Søgaard; H J Hermens; L Sandsjö; T Läubli; S Thorn; M M R Vollenbroek-Hutten; L Sell; H Christensen; A Klipstein; R Kadefors; R Merletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  A literature review of neck pain associated with computer use: public health implications.

Authors:  Bart N Green
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-08

8.  Multivariate, longitudinal analysis of the impact of changes in office work environments on surface electromyography measures.

Authors:  D C Cole; C Chen; S Hogg-Johnson; D Van Eerd; A Mazumder; R P Wells
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: the "BIT" follow up study on office workers.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; C Jensen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 10.  Systematic review of the role of occupational health and safety interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms, signs, disorders, injuries, claims and lost time.

Authors:  Carol A Kennedy; Benjamin C Amick; Jack T Dennerlein; Shelley Brewer; Starly Catli; Renee Williams; Consol Serra; Fred Gerr; Emma Irvin; Quenby Mahood; Al Franzblau; Dwayne Van Eerd; Bradley Evanoff; David Rempel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.