Literature DB >> 9702648

Oxygen saturation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children: general anesthesia versus intravenous sedation.

T Lamireau1, M Dubreuil, M Daconceicao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia may occur in children undergoing upper digestive endoscopy under sedation. The purpose of this study was to compare the occurrence of desaturation during intravenous sedation with that which occurs during general anesthesia.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients between 3 months and 6 years old underwent a diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy under sedation (n = 18) or general anesthesia (n = 18). Oxygen pulse oximetry, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were monitored throughout the procedure. At the end of the procedure, the operator gave the value of the endoscopy satisfaction score on a scale of I (very good conditions) to IV (impossible procedure).
RESULTS: The minimum oxygen pulse oximetry value was significantly lower in the sedation group compared with that in the general anesthesia group (89 +/- 5 vs. 97 +/- 1; p < 0.001). In the general anesthesia group, the oxygen pulse oximetry level declined to less than 95% in only one child; but in the sedation group, it declined to less than 95% in 16 patients (5.5% vs. 89%). Nine patients had a profound desaturation in sedation group (oxygen pulse oximetry < 90%); no patients in the general anesthesia group had desaturation (50% vs. 0%). In the general anesthesia group, heart rate and mean arterial pressure remained stable during the whole procedure, whereas in the sedation group, heart rate and mean arterial pressure increased significantly during the procedure. The endoscopy satisfaction score was I in all 18 patients in the general anesthesia group, whereas in the sedation group, it was I in only 2 patients, II in 8 patients, and III in 10 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that hypoxia during upper digestive endoscopy in patients under sedation is a frequent occurrence in children. When compared with sedation, general anesthesia is a safer technique that prevents hypoxia and allows the gastroenterologist to perform the endoscopy under better conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9702648     DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199808000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  5 in total

Review 1.  Controversy: Sedation of children for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G R Lawson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Compromised ventilation caused by tracheoesophageal fistula and gastrointestinal endoscope undergoing removal of disk battery on esophagus in pediatric patient -A case report-.

Authors:  Kyung-Woo Kim; Ji Yeon Kim; Jung Won Kim; Jang Su Park; Won Joo Choe; Kyung-Tae Kim; Sangil Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-23

3.  Clinical effectiveness of an anesthesiologist-administered intravenous sedation outside of the main operating room for pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Thailand.

Authors:  Somchai Amornyotin; Prapun Aanpreung
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-02

4.  Propofol versus Midazolam for Sedation during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children.

Authors:  Ji Eun Oh; Hae Jeong Lee; Young Hwan Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-07-31

5.  Propofol with and without Midazolam for Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies in Children.

Authors:  Ulas Emre Akbulut; Seyfi Kartal; Ufuk Dogan; Gulgun Elif Akcali; Serap Kalayci; Hulya Kirci
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2019-04-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.