Ji Eun Oh1, Hae Jeong Lee, Young Hwan Lee. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol and midazolam for sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 62 children who underwent ambulatory diagnostic EGD during 1-year period. Data were collected from 34 consecutive patients receiving propofol alone. Twenty-eight consecutive patients who received sedation with midazolam served as a comparison group. Outcome variables were length of procedure, time to recovery and need for additional supportive measures. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age, weight, sex, and the length of endoscopic procedure. The recovery time from sedation was markedly shorter in propofol group (30±16.41 minutes) compared with midazolam group (58.89±17.32 minutes; p<0.0001). During and after the procedure the mean heart rate was increased in midazolam group (133.04±19.92 and 97.82±16.7) compared with propofol group (110.26±20.14 and 83.26±12.33; p<0.0001). There was no localized pain during sedative administration in midazolam group, though six patients had localized pain during administration of propofol (p<0.028). There was no serious major complication associated with any of the 62 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous administered propofol provides faster recovery time and similarly safe sedation compared with midazolam in pediatric patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol and midazolam for sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 62 children who underwent ambulatory diagnostic EGD during 1-year period. Data were collected from 34 consecutive patients receiving propofol alone. Twenty-eight consecutive patients who received sedation with midazolam served as a comparison group. Outcome variables were length of procedure, time to recovery and need for additional supportive measures. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age, weight, sex, and the length of endoscopic procedure. The recovery time from sedation was markedly shorter in propofol group (30±16.41 minutes) compared with midazolam group (58.89±17.32 minutes; p<0.0001). During and after the procedure the mean heart rate was increased in midazolam group (133.04±19.92 and 97.82±16.7) compared with propofol group (110.26±20.14 and 83.26±12.33; p<0.0001). There was no localized pain during sedative administration in midazolam group, though six patients had localized pain during administration of propofol (p<0.028). There was no serious major complication associated with any of the 62 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous administered propofol provides faster recovery time and similarly safe sedation compared with midazolam in pediatric patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Authors: Stefan von Delius; Regina Hollweck; Roland M Schmid; Eckart Frimberger Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: Jenifer R Lightdale; Clarissa Valim; Adrienne R Newburg; Lisa B Mahoney; Steven Zgleszewski; Victor L Fox Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Joseph P Cravero; Michael L Beach; George T Blike; Susan M Gallagher; James H Hertzog Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Douglas K Rex; Viju P Deenadayalu; Emely Eid; Thomas F Imperiale; John A Walker; Kuldip Sandhu; Anthony C Clarke; Lybus C Hillman; Akira Horiuchi; Lawrence B Cohen; Ludwig T Heuss; Shajan Peter; Christoph Beglinger; James A Sinnott; Thomas Welton; Magdy Rofail; Iyad Subei; Rodger Sleven; Paul Jordan; John Goff; Patrick D Gerstenberger; Harold Munnings; Martin Tagle; Brian W Sipe; Till Wehrmann; Jack A Di Palma; Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Riphaus; Stephen T Amann; Gen Tohda; Timothy McClellan; Charles Thueson; John Morse; Nizam Meah Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Yoo Min Lee; Ben Kang; Yu Bin Kim; Hyun Jin Kim; Kyung Jae Lee; Yoon Lee; So Yoon Choi; Eun Hye Lee; Dae Yong Yi; Hyo Jeong Jang; You Jin Choi; Suk Jin Hong; Ju Young Kim; Yunkoo Kang; Soon Chul Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.153