Literature DB >> 9699575

Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study.

T E David1, R Puschmann, J Ivanov, J Bos, S Armstrong, C M Feindel, H E Scully.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential benefits of the hemodynamic superiority of stentless valves, we conducted a case-match study among patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with two types of porcine bioprostheses: the Toronto SPV and the stented Hancock II bioprosthesis.
METHODS: Preoperative clinical variables predictive of death after aortic valve replacement were determined by a stepwise logistic regression analysis in a series of 908 consecutive patients who received porcine aortic bioprostheses during a 14-year interval. Advanced age, New York Heart Association functional class IV, left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30%, and coronary artery disease were independent predictors of death. On the basis of these four variables, 198 pairs of patients who survived aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves were matched. The follow-up, truncated to the shortest interval for each matched pair, was 43 +/- 24 months for both groups.
RESULTS: At 8 years the actuarial survival was 91% +/- 4% for the Toronto SPV group and 69% +/- 8% for the Hancock II group (p = 0.006); the freedom from cardiac-related death was 95% +/- 4% for the Toronto SPV and 81% +/- 8% for the Hancock II (p = 0.01); the freedom from any valve-related complication was 81% +/- 5% for the Toronto SPV and 50% +/- 10% for the Hancock II (p = 0.008). A Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiac mortality rates and valve-related morbidity in patients who received the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis.
CONCLUSIONS: Although it is possible that confounding factors may have played a role in the clinical outcomes of this case-control study, the study suggests that aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine valve enhances survival. This is believed to be due to the hemodynamic superiority of these valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699575     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70122-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  13 in total

Review 1.  Choice of heart valve prosthesis.

Authors:  Peter Bloomfield
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

3.  [Risk of perioperative mortality and complications following biological aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: stented vs unstented bioprotheses].

Authors:  J Ennker; I Florath; U Rosendahl; S Bauer; E von Hodenberg; I C Ennker
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

4.  Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

Authors:  Prem S Shekar; Daniel Rinewalt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  Animal models for the atherosclerosis research: a review.

Authors:  Li Xiangdong; Liu Yuanwu; Zhang Hua; Ren Liming; Li Qiuyan; Li Ning
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 14.870

6.  Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.

Authors:  I Florath; A Albert; U Rosendahl; T Alexander; I C Ennker; J Ennker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-06-02

8.  Effect of surgeon on transprosthetic gradients after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis and its consequences: a follow-up study in 587 patients.

Authors:  Alexander Albert; Ines Florath; Ulrich Rosendahl; Wael Hassanein; Eberhard V Hodenberg; Stefan Bauer; Ina Ennker; Jürgen Ennker
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Treatment of aortic valve endocarditis with stented or stentless valve.

Authors:  Jeffrey Clemence; Juan Caceres; Tom Ren; Xiaoting Wu; Karen M Kim; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 6.439

10.  Inclusion cylinder method for aortic valve replacement utilising the Ross operation in adults with predominant aortic stenosis - 99% freedom from re-operation on the aortic valve at 15 years.

Authors:  Peter D Skillington; M Mostafa Mokhles; William Wilson; Leeanne Grigg; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; Johanna Takkenberg
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2013-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.