Literature DB >> 9699493

Effects of physiologic motion of the human brain upon quantitative 1H-MRS: analysis and correction by retro-gating.

J Felblinger1, R Kreis, C Boesch.   

Abstract

Signal loss and absolute quantitation errors in 1H-MRS (localized proton MR spectroscopy) because of physiologic brain motion are analyzed quantitatively. Cardiac and respiratory related motion lead to substantial phase dispersion when using a standard, short echo-time STEAM sequence. The loss in signal area varies from 6-7% with TM (middle interval time in a STEAM sequence) = 13.7 ms, to 25-39% with TM = 100 ms. The variation in signal area because of motion-related phase dispersion is up to 16% for TM = 100 ms. The signal phase as a function of the position in the cardiac cycle is shown to be reproducible. Maximal differences in the signal phase are over 180 degrees for long TMs. ECG-gating reduces the phase dispersion considerably but introduces problems with variable repetition times. Using a phase calibration curve recorded with the water suppression turned off, it is possible to retrogate subsequent untriggered acquisitions with the water suppression activated, if the time points in the cardiac cycle are recorded for each acquisition. The gain in signal intensity is between 3 and 21%. For absolute quantification via brain water, this phase analysis has the important consequence that reference scans must be phased individually before co-adding, otherwise metabolite concentrations may be severely overestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699493     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199805)11:3<107::aid-nbm525>3.0.co;2-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  10 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the effects of physiologic brain motion on point-resolved spectroscopy.

Authors:  P M Pattany; M G Massand; B C Bowen; R M Quencer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  On restoring motion-induced signal loss in single-voxel magnetic resonance spectra.

Authors:  Refaat E Gabr; Shashank Sathyanarayana; Michael Schär; Robert G Weiss; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  A novel phase and frequency navigator for proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy using water-suppression cycling.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst; Jikun Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Effects of physiologic human brain motion on proton spectroscopy: quantitative analysis and correction with cardiac gating.

Authors:  Pradip M Pattany; Imad H Khamis; Brian C Bowen; Karl Goodkin; R Gregory Weaver; James B Murdoch; M Judith Donovon Post; Robert M Quencer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Advanced MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Robert J Fox; Erik Beall; Pallab Bhattacharyya; Jacqueline T Chen; Ken Sakaie
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Real-time dynamic frequency and shim correction for single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Brian Keating; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Gradient moment compensated magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Kim; Meng Gu; Daniel M Spielman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification.

Authors:  Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Yuko Kono; Heather M Patton; Joel E Lavine; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Motion correction in magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Muhammad G Saleh; Richard A E Edden; Linda Chang; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.737

10.  A comparison of static and dynamic ∆B0 mapping methods for correction of CEST MRI in the presence of temporal B0 field variations.

Authors:  Esau Poblador Rodriguez; Philipp Moser; Barbara Dymerska; Simon Robinson; Benjamin Schmitt; Andre van der Kouwe; Stephan Gruber; Siegfried Trattnig; Wolfgang Bogner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.668

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.